Cotto or Froch - who is better boxer?

[Suckmedry]

Cotto is a way better technical fighter than Froch. Way better.

[PivotandRoll]

OK this is the biggest farce of an argument ever. Cotto ****s on Froch. You make a feeble attempt to discredit Cotto's career and think we won't catch you overlooking Froch's bull**** resume. Bute? That's a good win? really? What has Bute ever done? Who has he ever beat? Judah's resume with his losses is P4P better than Bute FFS. Cotto's Mosley win is ten times better than Froch's win over a shot Kessler. Groves ISN'T anywhere near as good as Paulie Malignaggi and he have Froch hell twice. Abraham? really? You think Abraham is on the same level as prime Quintana P4P?

What about Cotto beating Bailey? Corley? Fighters who ten years later were still beating young champions and prospects along with Paulie and Zab. If you think the 168 talent pool is even within reaching distance of the 147 one you are out of your mind and likely stupid.

[Sugar Adam Ali]

Cotto is a more skilled fighter, but in a fantasy h2h, a guy like froch would break cotto, much like how margarito did

[-DSG-]

Cotto!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[-DSG-]

Cotto is a more skilled fighter, but in a fantasy h2h, a guy like froch would break cotto, much like how margarito did

Froch fights nothing like Margarito.