Originally posted by Tom Jones
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Are Today's Fighters Better than Fighters From The Past? Hell Yes
Collapse
-
Originally posted by GJC View PostThink it's because their fans in their heart know they are in a weak era and gild the lily so to speak. They are dominant in a weak era, not their fault but it is what it is.
Comment
-
Originally posted by TheMagicMan View PostANd how are you judging a weak era? What quantifiable unit of measurement are you using other than nostalgia?
Dont really need to say much more so i'll ignore the rest of of mediocrities floating around.
Comment
-
Originally posted by GJC View PostMore a lack of nostalgia really, Briggs, Tua and Rahman are still top 25 ranked HWs.
Dont really need to say much more so i'll ignore the rest of of mediocrities floating around.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by TheMagicMan View PostHave you looked at top 25 lists from the 70's tons of bums stayed on the list, tons. Who was ranked number 23 all of 1974? Bums everywhere. HW division has always been about the top 3-4 guys, the 70's were one of the "best" eras because there was no great champion who ruled like Wlad does.
George Foreman, Champion
1.Muhammad Ali
2.Joe Frazier
3.Ken Norton
4.Jerry Quarry
5.Ron Lyle
6.Earnie Shavers
7.Oscar Bonavena
8.Joe Bugner
9.Jimmy Ellis
10.Chuck Wepner
Sure deeper down there will be some journeymen/bums but they will be 1973 journeymen/bums not 1965 journeymen/bums still hanging in there
Comment
Comment