Originally posted by $BloodyNate$
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Why not Brook vs Bradley? Who's #3!
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by DoktorSleepless View PostTop Rank is suing Haymon for $100 million. Only fights available to him in the top 10 are Pacquiao, Brook, Chaves, Ali, and Rios. He's fought Pacquiao, Chaves, and now Ali is next.
Only other guy is Brook. I have not heard Brook bang on Bradley's door. He's banging on bum bum Rios' door. Lets not forget how your punk as bitch Brook ducked Bradley already.
Bradley could have fought Rios himself but chose the much easier Vargas.
Brook never "ducked" Bradley. He was offered the fight for low money with TR having options on his future fights should he win. Why would he take that fight when he was already in line for a mandatory shot at the IBF with no options?Last edited by Dirk Diggler UK; 07-07-2015, 04:16 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Scipio2009 View PostBradley isn't going to be willing to travel to the UK for anything less than an extravagant some of money; If Brandon Rios can be "insulted" by an offer that Eddie Hearn has stated was well into seven figures, imagine what type of money Bradley would ask for.
Comment
-
Dirk has some hilarious double standards with his precious UK fighters.
Frampton and Quigg can duck Rigo because they have a theoretical mega fight with each other. Bradley had a theoretical mega fight with Pacquiao, but he ducked Khan! (All this ******ed bitterness you have over Bradley is over this, which is even funnier)
Frampton can duck Rigo because he's fighting his mandatory! Bradley is ducking because he's fighting his mandatory!
Rios is ducking Brook because he heard Brook wanted a rematch clause. Doesn't he know that's standard? Brook didn't duck Bradley because Bradley demanded a rematch clause!
$500k for a Bradley title shot was crap money, but $200k for Porter 3 years later was a jackpot!
Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View PostBrook and Hearn have both said they'd love the Bradley fight.
Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View PostBradley could have fought Rios himself but chose the much easier Vargas.
Comment
-
Originally posted by DoktorSleepless View PostDirk has some hilarious double standards with his precious UK fighters.
Frampton and Quigg can duck Rigo because they have a theoretical mega fight with each other. Bradley had a theoretical mega fight with Pacquiao, but he ducked Khan! (All this ******ed bitterness you have over Bradley is over this, which is even funnier)
Frampton can duck Rigo because he's fighting his mandatory! Bradley is ducking because he's fighting his mandatory!
Originally posted by DoktorSleepless View PostRios is ducking Brook because he heard Brook wanted a rematch clause. Doesn't he know that's standard? Brook didn't duck Bradley because Bradley demanded a rematch clause!
Originally posted by DoktorSleepless View Post$500k for a Bradley title shot was crap money, but $200k for Porter 3 years later was a jackpot!
Originally posted by DoktorSleepless View PostAnyone can say anything. Yet they were perusing Rios, not Bradley. Can't put any blame on Bradley if Brook is doing shit at all to pursue it.
Originally posted by DoktorSleepless View Postoh, lol. You're nitpicking over two ****y fighters. If he fought Rios, you'd be talking the same crap. Top Rank has a limited stable and he has to get fights for all his fighters. Rios has gotten a ton of big fights, and it was about time he got one for Vargas. Like you said, he's getting the paid the same either way, and he'll obviously have to fight Top Rank's entire stable eventually. You seriously think Bradley is afraid of Rios? Ali is obviously more dangerous than Rios or whichever bum Brook is going to face next. This is a great fight, and it was really the only good thing that came out of the ****ty Vargas matchup.
Fuk me, you got proper emotional
Comment
-
Originally posted by doktorsleepless View Postdirk has some hilarious double standards with his precious uk fighters.
Frampton and quigg can duck rigo because they have a theoretical mega fight with each other. Bradley had a theoretical mega fight with pacquiao, but he ducked khan! (all this ******ed bitterness you have over bradley is over this, which is even funnier)
frampton can duck rigo because he's fighting his mandatory! Bradley is ducking because he's fighting his mandatory!
Rios is ducking brook because he heard brook wanted a rematch clause. Doesn't he know that's standard? Brook didn't duck bradley because bradley demanded a rematch clause!
$500k for a bradley title shot was crap money, but $200k for porter 3 years later was a jackpot!
Anyone can say anything. Yet they were perusing rios, not bradley. Can't put any blame on bradley if brook is doing shit at all to pursue it.
Oh, lol. You're nitpicking over two ****y fighters. If he fought rios, you'd be talking the same crap. Top rank has a limited stable and he has to get fights for all his fighters. Rios has gotten a ton of big fights, and it was about time he got one for vargas. Like you said, he's getting the paid the same either way, and he'll obviously have to fight top rank's entire stable eventually. You seriously think bradley is afraid of rios? Ali is obviously more dangerous than rios or whichever bum brook is going to face next. This is a great fight, and it was really the only good thing that came out of the ****ty vargas matchup.
dirk will spin literally anything, no matter how illogical.. then hell add a to make it seems like hes done something
Comment
-
Originally posted by HanzGruber View Posthe had options, doe
dirk will spin literally anything, no matter how illogical.. then hell add a to make it seems like hes done something
All I did was state a fact and the kid caught feelings and went on a angry diatribe about me lol....like it's someone else's fault that Bradley re-signed with Top Rank knowing he'd get paid well for mediocre fights like Chaves and Jessie Vargas.
Brook-Bradley should happen at the end of the year or at least by early next year. Bradley's run of good fortune will finally be put to an end for good.
Comment
Comment