pointless thread. the only wins that matter are the fights that were actually fought. not who "would have most likely won", or "who would have been the favorite". if that's the case, we wouldn't need fights. we would just speculate and analyze who is the favorite to win.
Fighter "X" could have beaten fighter "Y" means absolute jack ****.
if anything else, the purpose of this thread is to discredit pac's win over DLH. well guess what b*tches, speculate all you want., it was pac that beat DLH.
cotto "would have" ko'd DLH
marg "could have" ko'd DLH
floyd "could have" ko'd DLH
shane "should have" ko'd DLH
but
Pacquiao DID ko DLH....
just sayin'
Fighter "X" could have beaten fighter "Y" means absolute jack ****.
if anything else, the purpose of this thread is to discredit pac's win over DLH. well guess what b*tches, speculate all you want., it was pac that beat DLH.
cotto "would have" ko'd DLH
marg "could have" ko'd DLH
floyd "could have" ko'd DLH
shane "should have" ko'd DLH
but
Pacquiao DID ko DLH....
just sayin'
Comment