The culture I can see on this site is really stupid. So many people on here totally disregard a fighter just because of a loss. It just leads to fighters cherrypicking, and then we don't get the fights people want to see, as a loss seems like the end of the world.
Some examples i've seen on here:
Broner-PDL: A LOT of people saw a fight where PDL won. If you like Broner, so what? The least you can do is accept the fact an overwhelming amount of people saw it differently. Even if he lost, so what? Look where he's at now. Why is it such a bitter pill to swallow?
Tavoris Cloud - i'm one of the biggest Cloud fans on this forum. I say he CLEARLY lost the Campillo fight. Not sure why Bradley/Broner fans can't accept it the same way. I guess you can come back and say oh those fights are different, but in reality, they aren't in most peoples eyes. Also with Cloud, after the Hopkins loss you see posts like "Cloud is finished, hes done". Seriously? He's a world class fighter who lost a couple of fights, so what?
Pacquiao - obviously we have the Marquez KO. After that, apparently Keith Thurman and Broner can easily beat him now. This only goes to show the deluded thinking, and the heavy focus on defeat on this forum. It's a sport, you win and lose. Nowadays, so much focus is on winning that it's now acceptable to take all options necessary to fabricate that 0.
Andre Ward - this is the extremes i've seen on the forum. This stems from the Bika fight - some posters on here genuinely say Bika should have won, and therefore Ward isn't all he's cracked up to be. I need not say more on this one.
Fighters who go against the grain? Top example, Carl Froch. The guy will fight anyone. He's not mixed up within the financial world. He knows, if he does all he can, he'll be set for life, which he is. He's so well respected, that his losses are just accepted, and still he's a warrior of the sport. He doesn't make excuses, even for the Kessler fight which either could have won. He has even admitted he could have lost the Dirrell fight. People thought he was finished after the Ward fight. He only went on to disprove everyone.
The best fighters in history, and even today have losses in their careers. But gradually, we'll get to a point where you won't get a title unless you have a 0, and noone will fight eachother. It's pathetic, and needs to change asap.
So what's everyones excuses?
Some examples i've seen on here:
Broner-PDL: A LOT of people saw a fight where PDL won. If you like Broner, so what? The least you can do is accept the fact an overwhelming amount of people saw it differently. Even if he lost, so what? Look where he's at now. Why is it such a bitter pill to swallow?
Tavoris Cloud - i'm one of the biggest Cloud fans on this forum. I say he CLEARLY lost the Campillo fight. Not sure why Bradley/Broner fans can't accept it the same way. I guess you can come back and say oh those fights are different, but in reality, they aren't in most peoples eyes. Also with Cloud, after the Hopkins loss you see posts like "Cloud is finished, hes done". Seriously? He's a world class fighter who lost a couple of fights, so what?
Pacquiao - obviously we have the Marquez KO. After that, apparently Keith Thurman and Broner can easily beat him now. This only goes to show the deluded thinking, and the heavy focus on defeat on this forum. It's a sport, you win and lose. Nowadays, so much focus is on winning that it's now acceptable to take all options necessary to fabricate that 0.
Andre Ward - this is the extremes i've seen on the forum. This stems from the Bika fight - some posters on here genuinely say Bika should have won, and therefore Ward isn't all he's cracked up to be. I need not say more on this one.
Fighters who go against the grain? Top example, Carl Froch. The guy will fight anyone. He's not mixed up within the financial world. He knows, if he does all he can, he'll be set for life, which he is. He's so well respected, that his losses are just accepted, and still he's a warrior of the sport. He doesn't make excuses, even for the Kessler fight which either could have won. He has even admitted he could have lost the Dirrell fight. People thought he was finished after the Ward fight. He only went on to disprove everyone.
The best fighters in history, and even today have losses in their careers. But gradually, we'll get to a point where you won't get a title unless you have a 0, and noone will fight eachother. It's pathetic, and needs to change asap.
So what's everyones excuses?
Comment