UFC: Hendricks vs. Lawler II: Who You Got?

[$Bullsfam$]

Lmao how is this a robbery? It's only a robbery when a fighter clearly won a majority of the rounds. Sure rounds 1 and 4 were close and Lawler needed both of them to win but you can easily give him both those rounds as he landed harder and landed more on Hendricks early in the 1st then Hendricks did later in the round.

And the 4th round Hendricks started off well but then went to wall and stalling which allowed Lawler to steal it with those brutal elbows.

So how again was this a robbery?

[KingOne]

Lmao how is this a robbery? It's only a robbery when a fighter clearly won a majority of the rounds. Sure rounds 1 and 4 were close and Lawler needed both of them to win but you can easily give him both those rounds as he landed harder and landed more on Hendricks early in the 1st then Hendricks did later in the round.

And the 4th round Hendricks started off well but then went to wall and stalling which allowed Lawler to steal it with those brutal elbows.

So how again was this a robbery?

Totally agree.

[Evol]

this was a close close fight but i think they gave it to robbie based on his story coming up as a fighter. i mean leading up to the fight during the countdown robbie did mention that him getting the win will be a perfect cap to his career. and then before the fight started dana white was rambling on and on about how robbie is a completely different fighter now than when he first met him when robbie was 20 yr old blah blah blah..

[Zn1]

Bloodynates is saying it ain't a robbery so that means it was a robbery

now if it makes you happy, it wasn't a robbery but the wrong guy won, k?

[$Bullsfam$]

Honored by the shout out Snig.

But this falls along the lines of fights like Rampage/Forrest, Shogun/Machida 1, or the Edgar - Henderson fights. Close fights where either guy has a case to win.

Robberies are more like Pearson-Diego, Bisping-Hamil, or Edgar - Penn 1.