Originally posted by Weebler I
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Victor Emilio Ramirez vs. Ovill McKenzie for the IBF Cruiserweight title Friday Oct 2
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Cobra_ View PostFair score. Neither really deserved a win to be honest.
McKenzie ran and pitty-patted ineffectively all night. Ramirez plodded on slow feet and showed an inability to time his opponent.
That being said, I thought Ramirez at least tried to make a fight of it. He was the aggressor for virtually the entire fight and did land the harder, more effective punches, and so deserved to win.
Comment
-
An either way fight. Draw was fair. Surprised at the scorecards which were all fair.
First time seeing Ramirez and he is absolutely terrible.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Freedom. View PostNeither is a world-class cruiserweight.
McKenzie ran and pitty-patted ineffectively all night. Ramirez plodded on slow feet and showed an inability to time his opponent.
That being said, I thought Ramirez at least tried to make a fight of it. He was the aggressor for virtually the entire fight and did land the harder, more effective punches, and so deserved to win.
Don't know how you had it 7-2 after nine rounds. You must score for fighters who just plod forward and land nothing.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View PostThe BoxNation pundits repeatedly stated that the scorecards were very fair.
Something must be wrong with your hearing or you're just trying to kick up a fuss for no reason.
Even they seemed shocked and acted surprised at the fair scorecards, acting like they expected a robbery.
Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View PostAn either way fight. Draw was fair. Surprised at the scorecards which were all fair.
First time seeing Ramirez and he is absolutely terrible.
Really shouldn't be the people to complain about scorecards and robberies.
Both Argentina and the UK are biased as hell when scoring fights involving their fighters.
Pot, meet kettle.
Comment
-
McKenzie could've made his life a lot easier if he used the jab more and kept Ramirez at distance. Ramirez walked forward in straight lines with no head movement. However, McKenzie put a performance of a lifetime and should be proud of himself.
The score cards were fair.Last edited by Box-Office; 10-03-2015, 02:30 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by glenn mcrory View PostTrying to force him to travel(blaming it on where it took place), and them generally complaining about the scorecards of the argentinian tv commentators.
Even they seemed shocked and acted surprised at the fair scorecards, acting like they expected a robbery.
Originally posted by glenn mcrory View PostHell, you were expecting one.
Really shouldn't be the people to complain about scorecards and robberies.
Both Argentina and the UK are biased as hell when scoring fights involving their fighters.
Pot, meet kettle.
I expected the cards to be wide in favour of Ramirez.Last edited by Dirk Diggler UK; 10-03-2015, 06:27 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View PostHow can pundits force him to travel? Lol...you're really desperate to look for controversy, aren't you?
Of course I was. This is boxing. Doesn't matter where it is, we've been programmed to believe that the home fighter will get the decision in a close fight. Especially against a fairly unheralded journeyman like McKenzie.
I expected the cards to be wide in favour of Ramirez.
They really are in no position to talk, IMO.
Comment
Comment