The media thoughts on the froch verses dirrell fight..

[slimshandy69]

All thought froch won...lmao at the idiots on this forum...NOT ONE SAID IT WAS CONTROVEDRTIUAL, NOT ONE...





http://www.********boxing.com/news.php?p=21570&more=1

http://www.rte.ie/sport/boxing/2009/1018/frochc.html

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/oth...-be-a-war.html

[slimshandy69]

blanked by the yanks and calzaghe boys..

[Freddy Krueger]

The british announcers had Froch losing because they tried not to be as biased but still were a bit.

[VipersThunder]

Froch only won by default because Dirrell was running so much. Dirrell landed the better punches by far.

[keepthemhandsup]

All thought froch won...lmao at the idiots on this forum...NOT ONE SAID IT WAS CONTROVEDRTIUAL, NOT ONE...





http://www.********boxing.com/news.php?p=21570&more=1

http://www.rte.ie/sport/boxing/2009/1018/frochc.html

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/oth...-be-a-war.html

like how all your links are from the UK

[slimshandy69]

Froch only won by default because Dirrell was running so much. Dirrell landed the better punches by far.

so why are the action phtos im showing far better than the dirrell olnes???


btw i was actually at the fight...live...everyone at ringsoide had froch winning..


the bbc 5 live commentary whoi hate froch had him winning...and were amazed it was even split decision...


Basically this forum is full of idiots like you...

[Sam D. Menace]

Froch only won by default because Dirrell was running so much. Dirrell landed the better punches by far.

you cant lose a fight from running or floyd mayweather would've lost for running away from a baby in marquez

[Dice]

Well the editors of this website had Dirrell winning as well as Ring magazine and others but they feel, as I, a fellow American, feel that while Dirrel won the fight, we dont think it was some huge robbery like others are claiming it to be.

I agree that Dirrell ran but he hit Froch plenty of times while Froch was hitting air all night.

Regardless I think Mikkel Kessler is going to take the whole tourny anyways unless he forgets hes Mikkel Kessler

I also gotta say I like the UK broadcasting team, obviously they favor the English fighters but they are brutally honest and for those that say it was a hometown decision, none of the judges were English if i remember correctly

[slimshandy69]

Well the editors of this website had Dirrell winning as well as Ring magazine and others but they feel, as I, a fellow American, feel that while Dirrel won the fight, we dont think it was some huge robbery like others are claiming it to be.

I agree that Dirrell ran but he hit Froch plenty of times while Froch was hitting air all night.

Regardless I think Mikkel Kessler is going to take the whole tourny anyways unless he forgets hes Mikkel Kessler

I also gotta say I like the UK broadcasting team, obviously they favor the English fighters but they are brutally honest and for those that say it was a hometown decision, none of the judges were English if i remember correctly

no he didnt hit froch plentty of times...i was actually live at the fight and his throwing ratio was terrible...froch continually threw the jab hence why dirrells face was a mess and froch had no scratches...


dirrell although veryt skillful is a horrifically boring fighter...

[The Hammer]

Carl Froch won 114-113 on my card.

The decision was fair, I'm even happy to see it was a SD instead of a UD because the fight was very close.

Yes, Dirrell is the more talented fighter, but his game plan STUNK. Fighters who run, fall, hold, bend and ***** for 12 rounds don't deserve to win world titles.