Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

carl froch is the luckiest boxer ever...

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    When someone is that lucky, then its more than just luck.

    Froch is a very limited fighter with a hard punch and decent chin.He's got where he is by total dedication as an athelete and sheer determination. With his skill set he's achieved a great deal and should be respected.

    Comment


    • #22
      atleast you have finally realized this TS,he just ent that good kid

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by slimshandy69 View Post
        sorry i dont get your joke???
        It's because you're too much a Carl Froch nuthugger.

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by slimshandy69 View Post
          i hate him, he really is one lucky mofo, and im not just talking about the fact hes won in life with his fit bird..


          The guy has literally no speed, hes so slow, and has caveman like reactions..


          He won the bronze at the world amateur championships, flukey or what. he first englishman to ever achieve this feat. The judges must have been paid to give this man such a good amateur pedigree because someone with such little technique cant surely have got a medal at the highest standard amateur bouts..


          Then he turns pro at an old age of 26, within 10 fights defeats a tough african for the commonwealth title charles amadumu with a lucky right hand that near knocked the guys head off. Had it not been for that lucky right hand he would have lost that fight...

          He then beats european class brian magee, fr someone whos so ****, how could he even get past british domestic level let alone european class. Had it not been for that lucky uppercut froch threw that sparked out brian magee he would have lost the fight..such a lukcy prick...

          He then wins the longdale british belt out right against robin reid, a guy who schooled calslappe. Granted froch admitted reid was past his best but to tko him in the 5th was so lukcy. Reid still had the power and laced him with a near pefect right hook. Dam that lukcy froch for having a granite chin. Had it not been for frochs grantite chin he would have lost that fight by knock out..grrrrrrrr

          He then flukes it against now light heavy weight young stud jean pascal..Froch was so lukcy. Had pascal fought the right fight he would have beaten froch. Froch was lucky the world class pascal fought the wrong fight. Otherwise he would have lost to the younger world class pacal...


          Then the nottingha **** has the audacity to take on a world class boxer in america JERMAINE TAYLOR, a guy who is also younger than froch, IN AMERICA. The audacity, he should have done calzaghes route of fighting mario veit and manfrado in wales for 10 years. he fluked that. He did about 30 lucky puches to tAYLORS face in round 12th. Had ti not been for frochs conditioning he would have lost that fight..very lucky boy..


          The he fights and defeats skillful bronze medalist and younger andre dirrell. Froch bloodied dirrells nose, lips and left eye. In a fight where dirrell ran from froch, did illegal holding and never landed anything of note froch derved the decision against a fighter that will surely come again..iF ONLY dirrell didnt run froch would have lost. very lucky boy


          So there frochs flukey career. He has no skill yet has achieved world class heights in both amateur and professional level, winning pretty much every belt aaprt from the european honours. Can you lot think of anymore lucky boxers???
          what are you still doing here. different day same ****. fcuk off with your love for froch. he is ****e. he cant even get his biggest fights broadcast on british tv because he is ****e.

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by ani4ani View Post
            When someone is that lucky, then its more than just luck.

            Froch is a very limited fighter with a hard punch and decent chin.He's got where he is by total dedication as an athelete and sheer determination. With his skill set he's achieved a great deal and should be respected.
            I think this is a good analysis.

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by ItaZY View Post
              Yah cause Ali wasnt a boxer he was a runner, clearly not boxing
              A prime Ali, was great. A prime Ali was knocking fools out or would try, sure Ali ran, Ali danced, Ali shuffled, Ali later relied on the rope a dope but a prime Dirrell is nothing but a runner, how are you going to compare a prime Ali to a Prime Dirrell?

              Ali did not try to steal Liston's belt, he made Liston quit. Ali won the belt, earned the belt.

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by shade darkar View Post
                what are you still doing here. different day same ****. fcuk off with your love for froch. he is ****e. he cant even get his biggest fights broadcast on british tv because he is ****e.
                this is a anti froch thread called "froch is the luckiest boxer ever" how is this showing my love for froch, unless im laying hard to get..???


                BTW since you agree with me could you explain how froch got a bronze at amateur level(world championships) hardly losing any fights..then wins the english title, british title out right, the common wealth title and has the WBC title, the most prestigous of all the belts..

                Hes defended it against two world class fighters in dirrell and taylor...

                Comment

                Working...
                X
                TOP