Nobody can speak for what's "good for boxing"

[insipiens]

It's just a stupid thing to say, that a certain outcome or even a certain match is "good for boxing." It might be good for a particular fighter, or promoter, etc., but what's good for "boxing" is just not the kind of thing you can make a claim about.

kball and his sort do this kind of thing.

[TURKOGLU]

Fuсk off, harlot.

A Heavyweight champion who could capture America like Tyson did would be good for boxing.

[TURKOGLU]

Fighters with great talent fighting other fighters with great talent is always good for boxing.

[TURKOGLU]

Floyd God-motherfuсking-damn Mayweather is good for boxing.

[TURKOGLU]

Don't believe me?

Wait 10 years.

[insipiens]

Fuсk off, harlot.

A Heavyweight champion who could capture America like Tyson did would be good for boxing.

Is it good for boxing in Germany, Russia, the Philippines, and the UK, where some of the big fanbases, TV stations, and promotional companies are?

Boxing doesn't even need America. We are one small country with about 5% of the world's population

[VirusTI]

Floyd is just as boring as Wlad, that is to say i like them both.

[insipiens]

Floyd God-motherfuсking-damn Mayweather is good for boxing.

He's quite good AT boxing.

[insipiens]

Was Tyson "good for boxing?" Some assume 'yes', some think more carefully and say 'no'. I think most carefully and dismiss the question and misstated.

[TURKOGLU]

Is it good for boxing in Germany, Russia, the Philippines, and the UK, where some of the big fanbases, TV stations, and promotional companies are?

Boxing doesn't even need America. We are one small country with about 5% of the world's population

Suck ****, scum skin.

It's easier for a Great American fighter to capture World recognition than it is for a Great German fighter.

Why? Because there's been so many other Great American fighters before him.