Originally posted by Weebler I
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The Brits Deserve a LOT of RESPECT
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by 1hourRun View PostOur best have a far greater resume than most if not all Brits historically and presently speaking...not one of your fighters have a better resume than Ward,Crawford,Garcia,Bradley,...you guys cant find one person to beat the Charlos or Andrade even our middleweight Danny Jacobs is over any of your middleweights....not one of your superfeather weights can touch Mikey Garcia...and you all know this...keep trying to fool the public...real boxing fans know the truth.
BJS/Eubanks would be very competitive with Jacobs. I don't see why it couldn't be. Andy Lee ended Quillin who was meant to be too slick and I don't even rate Andy highly. Beefy at 154lbs is a champion too.
Regardless of whether they are THE undisputed best in their weight divisions (and they are in certain weight divisions), the sheer number of British champs with proper belts in all of these divisions is crazy.
Comment
-
Originally posted by hayZ View PostWell, you do have a population that is around 5 times as big as ours so obviously you're going to have more, which is why I said P4P. Crawford is champ at 140lbs but its a dead division. All of the best of 5-6 years ago at 140lbs moved up to 147lbs. Fighting a small, bloated Gamboa and Postol does not give you a better resume than Khan and/even Brook (Porter win > Postol/Gamboa IMO). It's hard to rate Brook with the likes of Bradley as Brook has only 1 world class win. He beat a real champion to become a champion. He is a LEGIT champ.
BJS/Eubanks would be very competitive with Jacobs. I don't see why it couldn't be. Andy Lee ended Quillin who was meant to be too slick and I don't even rate Andy highly. Beefy at 154lbs is a champion too.
Regardless of whether they are THE undisputed best in their weight divisions (and they are in certain weight divisions), the sheer number of British champs with proper belts in all of these divisions is crazy.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by 1hourRun View PostStopped reading there. Postol was undefeated #1. vs. # 2. for the lineal title...nice try you Brits are good liars and con men.
Comment
-
Originally posted by hayZ View PostHaha, so what? It's easy to be undefeated when you're fighting scrubs. I'm talking about ability. You aren't fighting someones record in the Ring, you're fighting their ability. We've seen Porter dominate Broner, Malignaggi and give Thurman/Brook a real run for their money, VERY competitive fights vs world class, ELITE Boxers.
Comment
-
Originally posted by 1hourRun View PostPostol beat the #1. guy @ 140 in Matthysse and Gamboa has better resume than Kell Brook ; you somehow forget Crawford also owns a win over 1 of 3 Brtis to ever win titles in 3 weights ( Ricky Burns)...your argument is weak take your L and move on. Schools over.
Comment
-
American's just get upset because we can steal your women easily
And there's some truth to that.
Comment
Comment