Originally posted by JOM'S
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Revisiting NBA's 50 greatest players after 15yrs...
Collapse
-
Originally posted by -MAKAVELLI- View Posti might hesitate on #9 and 10 manong
but agree with everyone else...the original 50 earned their spot as will the new class...they should just add and not remove anyone
but if they do remove players, im ok with them removing any Celtics from the list
Comment
-
Originally posted by Chadmack View Post1996 kaya ko sinabi na after15yrs
I am sure hindi sila magbabawas sa unang 50 na napili, tingin ko huhugot pa rin nga sila ng mga players that time na hindi naipasok or naisnab ...
Comment
-
Originally posted by Chadmack View Postkobe
duncan
nash
nowitzki
iverson
kidd
yan lang naiisip ko. Wade, not yet there as well as Lebron(need i say why?). i am thinking of ben wallace, defense and rebound specialist, but then again, perhaps not!
Comment
-
Mitch Richmond
Dale Ellis
Xavier McDaniel
TOm Chambers
Tim Hardaway
Rolando Blackman
Mark Aguirre
Adrian Dantley
Mark Price
Glen Rice
Reggie Lewis
Reggie Miller
Buck Williams
Sydney Moncriep ( Spelling?? )
Marquez Johnson
Jeff Malone
Jeff Jornacek
Thunder Dan Majerly
Kelly Tripucka
James Edwards
Rick Mahorn
Bill Hanzlik
Jerome Kersey
Terry Porter
Bobby Jones
Wayne Cooper
Mauric Lucas
Larry Nance
** Almost but not quite **
Comment
-
Originally posted by miron_lang View Post1. Kobe Bryant
2. Dirk Nowitzki
3. Tim Duncan
4. Kevin Garnett
5. Paul Pierce
6. Rey Allen
7. Dwayne Wade
8. Jason Kidd
9. Tracy McGrady
10. Vince Carter
11. Allen Iverson
Comment
-
Originally posted by Asian Sensation View PostMcGrady, Carter and Iverson shouldn't be on the list IMO. And even still, Iverson should be above them, because at least he led his team to the Finals single-handedly. McGrady and Carter have both been addled by injuries their whole careers and McGrady has never even seen the second round of the playoffs.
if we are forced to name 15 then those 3 might get in. They should wait another 50 yrs to name the next 50.
Comment
-
Originally posted by miron_lang View PostGood point.
if we are forced to name 15 then those 3 might get in. They should wait another 50 yrs to name the next 50.
Comment
Comment