Originally posted by aboutfkntime
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Pacquiao/Joshua, Past/Future: BoxingScene Ratings Update
Collapse
-
Originally posted by crold1 View PostThat's why I took the time to explain the caveats. Monzon is the only number that really counts. Hopkins didn't do what he did either. That's why I recognize different numbers on the ratings for Hopkins and Monzon.
But you might as well explain how the hell you got Ward above Pac p4p tsk tsk
Comment
-
Originally posted by crold1 View PostThat's why I took the time to explain the caveats. Monzon is the only number that really counts. Hopkins didn't do what he did either. That's why I recognize different numbers on the ratings for Hopkins and Monzon.
Fair call, but the waters are getting pretty muddy for the casual fans.
Comment
-
Originally posted by HeroBando View PostWhy do you bother with that moronic poser? Not only is he too stupid to process your response, but also this "sanctity of belts" phony wants Canelo vs Ggg at 155 for 3 belts + lineal.
But you might as well explain how the hell you got Ward above Pac p4p tsk tsk
casual pacstain, I think that most of the belts today are ****, and not worth the paper they are printed on..... that was actually my entire point, foolio.
Canelo holding middleweight hardware as well as the lineal title, despite never actually fighting a middleweight opponent, kinda proves that..... don't ya thunk?
Hey, do you still vehemently support manny-weight, whilst bashing canelo-weight, in the same sentence?
Comment
-
Originally posted by crold1 View PostGoing into the fight, the site had Pac and TB 1-2 with the title vacant. That fills a vacancy, same as it did with Crawford-Beltran. The only other guy who has any real case at 47 IMO is Brook but there just isn't enough there yet. Ring doesn't concur. Folks can feel free to debate this one. Be a better debate if the guys you name had taken tougher challenges in the last year. As is, It was consistent with the way things are always done.
As to GGG, addressed his #s issue previously: http://www.boxingscene.com/-golovkin-catch-hopkins-defense-record-160--94855
If Canelo drops his belt for not wanting to face mando above 155, is he still lineal? If so, how long does he get to be lineal at 155? Mostly curious if Pac has a chance at that 6th lineal belt in may 2017, but interesting nonetheless
Comment
-
Originally posted by HeroBando View PostOK forget about the Ward vs Pac ranking, that one might be too loaded. But how about this technical one:
If Canelo drops his belt for not wanting to face mando above 155, is he still lineal? If so, how long does he get to be lineal at 155? Mostly curious if Pac has a chance at that 6th lineal belt in may 2017, but interesting nonetheless
Stop being silly willya.....
Hell will freeze over before Pac gets in the ring with Canelo.
The only reason why Manny fought Bradley the first time is because he refused to rematch Cotto at 150..... Pac demanded 147, and the fight fell over because of the weight.... despite Cotto being Pac's first-choice opponent.
So the chance of Pac fighting Canelo is 0, cry yourself off to sleep.
Comment
Comment