Please someone with commonsense tell me how you discredit floyds hatton win

[FerdinandMarcos]

Why are you trying to turn this into a thread about Pac and roids?

Just saying.

[jrosales13]

Why are you trying to turn this into a thread about Pac and roids?

Because he has little or no argument relating to the thread?

That is all there is to it,

that is why he keeps on bringing Pac up.

He just has no argument like Dirk posted.

Is actually quite hilarious to see him scramble around "well........well........ umm..............Pac is a cheater fighting another cheater.......... yea ha ha ha, take that"

[FerdinandMarcos]

Yeah and thats true. I still dont get the point you're trying to make.

Mayweather beat him at 147. That is what actually happened. So we can only give him credit for what actually happened. Not a hypothetical fight at 140.

HATTON is the reason it didn't happen at 140..

Ricky declined.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

HATTON is the reason it didn't happen at 140..

Ricky declined.

So what does that have to do with how much credit Mayweather gets for beating him at 147?

[jpunieves]

HATTON is the reason it didn't happen at 140..

Ricky declined.

hahaha

answer the thread you twat... don't be like your idol floyd murmuring and uttering words you do not even know about

[STRUGG]

hatton.....never was at his best at welterweight...........

[ma51f]

i mean seriously..why do people discredit every fighters wins??

haters will always find a way to discredit an opponant regardless of how flawed their thinking is...

[infamous larryx]

not saying its a great victory..but its a very solid good victory

[STRUGG]

not saying its a great victory..but its a very solid good victory

its an ok win.......a good solid win was Koing hatton by 2 rounds....