Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Us-anti doping blames manny

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by MexicanMauler View Post
    Competitors? Are you ****ing ******ed? NSAC commission overseas sporting events. USADA overseas drugs and drug testing.

    At first, I didn't think Manny "Roidman" Pokeqiao was on the juice, but he's ducking those tests like if he was playing ****ing dodge ball or something.
    that proves you're a ******ed floyd fan. If USADA wants to have that test why not convince the commission? They should sit down with the commission and agree.

    Boxers will just follow what the commission will agree with.

    Why blame pacman of following NSAC?

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by sNiTcH View Post
      If a boxer is willing to clean up the sports, he should go and suggest it to the committee. The committee makes the rule.

      Thats simple and logical.

      Can you imagine a sport without a committee?


      They can make the rules re ring size, glove size, knockdown rule, etc etc etc. The USADA or WADA or whoever will not take that role over.

      Here in Australia we have a football commissiom for Australian Rules Football (AFL) who make all the policy decisions, rules (rule changes), fixturing, penalties for breaking coders of conduct, suspensions etc......and every other aspect in regard to the day to day operations of the AFL. Yet it is WADA that conducts the in and out of competition testing......the reason this was done is to give the sport "credibility"!!!!!!!!!

      Giving an extrnal agency control of testing does not relinquish the NSAC's main (and overriding) functions with regard to the sport of boxing.

      Wake up!!!!

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by sNiTcH View Post
        that proves you're a ******ed floyd fan. If USADA wants to have that test why not convince the commission? They should sit down with the commission and agree.

        Boxers will just follow what the commission will agree with.

        Why blame pacman of following NSAC?
        I'm not even a Floyd Mayweather fan you idiot. The NSAC drug testing is a joke. And thats what the point of this thread is.

        Comment


        • #24
          Looking for Mosley and Mayweather to do 6 random blood test+ and unlimited urine which i doubt they would. If not he is going to look like an ass

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by check hook View Post
            They can make the rules re ring size, glove size, knockdown rule, etc etc etc. The USADA or WADA or whoever will not take that role over.

            Here in Australia we have a football commissiom for Australian Rules Football (AFL) who make all the policy decisions, rules (rule changes), fixturing, penalties for breaking coders of conduct, suspensions etc......and every other aspect in regard to the day to day operations of the AFL. Yet it is WADA that conducts the in and out of competition testing......the reason this was done is to give the sport "credibility"!!!!!!!!!

            Giving an extrnal agency control of testing does not relinquish the NSAC's main (and overriding) functions with regard to the sport of boxing.

            Wake up!!!!
            No you should wake up. AFL commission agree to that. Why not those WADA/USADA sit down and talk with the commission and agree?

            Boxing committee has nothing to hide. IF those agreement will be implemented I don't think boxers will disagree.

            Comment


            • #26
              Funny how USADA goes out of there way to blame Manny. I don't see them pointing fingers at any other athletes.

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by MexicanMauler View Post
                Competitors? Are you ****ing ******ed? NSAC commission overseas sporting events. USADA overseas drugs and drug testing.

                At first, I didn't think Manny "Roidman" Pokeqiao was on the juice, but he's ducking those tests like if he was playing ****ing dodge ball or something.
                You meant OVERSEES...

                Ducking doesn't equate admission of guilt. Raising questions, sure but not automatically "guilty".

                Comment


                • #28
                  Originally posted by MexicanMauler View Post
                  I'm not even a Floyd Mayweather fan you idiot. The NSAC drug testing is a joke. And thats what the point of this thread is.


                  Thankyou.........that is the point.......as boxing fans we shopuld all collectively recognise that it is indeed a joke and all fighters deserve better than what the NSAC is serving up in this regard. All boxing fans (Mayweather, Mosley, Pac whoever you follow as your number 1) should want better testing procedures......

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Originally posted by check hook View Post
                    They can make the rules re ring size, glove size, knockdown rule, etc etc etc. The USADA or WADA or whoever will not take that role over.

                    Here in Australia we have a football commissiom for Australian Rules Football (AFL) who make all the policy decisions, rules (rule changes), fixturing, penalties for breaking coders of conduct, suspensions etc......and every other aspect in regard to the day to day operations of the AFL. Yet it is WADA that conducts the in and out of competition testing......the reason this was done is to give the sport "credibility"!!!!!!!!!

                    Giving an extrnal agency control of testing does not relinquish the NSAC's main (and overriding) functions with regard to the sport of boxing.

                    Wake up!!!!

                    Makes a lot of sense, but they wont understand. They think Pacquiao is god and talking ill of him is blasphemy, I've never heard of a Mayweather fan that delusional.

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Originally posted by fabie View Post
                      You meant OVERSEES...

                      Ducking doesn't equate admission of guilt. Raising questions, sure but not automatically "guilty".


                      This is true it raises ????......not automatic guilt....but why raise them in the first place when it can be avoided. A 14 day-cut off was a good solution......both sides meeting in the middle like they did with the $$$ split.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP