So just looking at a history of his big fights, ALL with disputed score cards. Are we ready to admit the judges have a big bias for Canelo?
Lets peek the script
1. Mayweather Vs Canelo, most people saw it as a 12 round sweep, one score card has given him 6 rounds.
2. Canelo Vs Trout, Canelo seemed to be way ahead and even with the knock down to far ahead.
3. Canelo Vs Lara, some felt that Lara comfortably out pitches Canelo, Only for Canelo to win in another disputed issue, I personally had it 8-4.
4. Canelo Vs Khan, some felt that Khan was 4-0 or 5-0 up until the point of the Knockdown, most notably Teddy Atlas.
So it seems that Canelo in immune to jabbing and boxing movement.
Mayweather Vs Pacquiao
Trout Vs Cotto
Maidana Vs Alexander
same thing different outcome.
And of course hundreds more fights when boxing did count.
Lets peek the script
1. Mayweather Vs Canelo, most people saw it as a 12 round sweep, one score card has given him 6 rounds.
2. Canelo Vs Trout, Canelo seemed to be way ahead and even with the knock down to far ahead.
3. Canelo Vs Lara, some felt that Lara comfortably out pitches Canelo, Only for Canelo to win in another disputed issue, I personally had it 8-4.
4. Canelo Vs Khan, some felt that Khan was 4-0 or 5-0 up until the point of the Knockdown, most notably Teddy Atlas.
So it seems that Canelo in immune to jabbing and boxing movement.
Mayweather Vs Pacquiao
Trout Vs Cotto
Maidana Vs Alexander
same thing different outcome.
And of course hundreds more fights when boxing did count.
Comment