Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Should boxing rings be a standardised size?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Hell yea n make them small. If you truly have skills you shouldn't be running.

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by Mr. Fantastic View Post
      Hell yea n make them small. If you truly have skills you shouldn't be running.
      This. Its a combat sport not ballet

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by frosty-g View Post
        wouldnt work because a single show would either have to have multiple rings or just have fighters from a single weight class.
        nice idea otherwise though
        didn't think about that..so then yeah one ring size should be standard.

        Comment


        • #14
          I made this thread several months ago. But not many took heed to it.

          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by Panginoon View Post
            Yup it should all be standard for every fight.
            A 108 pounder would get lost in a 26ft ring that Klit fights in , its relative to the weight class , ring size is another manipulation that a matchmaker can turn a fight into his advantage , just like a Pac vs slow Margo in a 26 ft ring did for Pac , put them in a 16ft ring and Margo rolls over him because he cant get away ,,,,,,,eventually .

            Should be 16-18 up to WW , 18-20 from WW to LH and 22-26 from cruiser up , would stop BS like Mannys 26 ft ring , but would still allow a trainer to match his fighter in a ring that favors his boys style .

            Comment


            • #16
              Most definitely, for all the reasons previously stated.

              Comment

              Working...
              X
              TOP