I am failing to buy into the Wilshere English media hype just yet.
1 decent season doesn't make a player.
He's no hype. He's the real deal, surely you're forgetting how he owned Xavi at the Emirates? I almost find it hard to believe he's English. A bum wouldn't school the likes of Xavi.
Arsenal need a thug in midfield. They had Song last year and Diaby was good till he got injured this year.
I always felt M'Vila was the man for Arsenal but he's banned for a year over some stupid ****.
He's no hype. He's the real deal, surely you're forgetting how he owned Xavi at the Emirates? I almost find it hard to believe he's English. A bum wouldn't school the likes of Xavi.
Arsenal need a thug in midfield. They had Song last year and Diaby was good till he got injured this year.
I always felt M'Vila was the man for Arsenal but he's banned for a year over some stupid ****.
Owned somebody whilst getting knocked the fuuuuuck out of the tournament and going another year without a trophy. I would take a good 90 minutes over silverware anyday
City will walk the league, imo. Once they hit their stride, probably.
They aren't good in the Champions' league though, regardless of how tough their group is, there's an element of the flat-track bully about 'em. Ajax are average but they are used to winning. City would never get beat comprehensively by Everton for example, and I think Everton are much stronger side than Ajax.
That said if Mourinho managed City they'd be guaranteed at least a semi-final berth and the league would be an absolute procession of mind-numbing inevitability for everyone but City fans. Mancini is a bit wet. Roman would sack him as soon as look at him, lol.
Mourinho shapes the future of English football. Man U, City, or Chelsea? Wherever he goes they will become the dominant force. Even Fergie knows this.
Comment