Is Manny Pacquiao the most technical brawler in the history of boxing?

[icebergisonfire]

He doesn't know how to cut off a ring. His jump in, jump out style is predictable to time.

[GOAT86]

Brawlers tend to forget technique. Hard to tell if a brawler got technique at all, rather than power and stamina.

[STREET CLEANER]

Amir is a natural boxer. With Harrison he adapted the 'brawler' style but now with Roach he is becoming an offensive minded boxer that can also fight on the backfoot.

Dude, your perception of boxing style is convoluted. Manny is aggressive and it is not a brawling style, he will counterpunch in the pocket, it is how he gets most of his knockdowns cause of his superb reflexes. He is not a boxer cause his offensive is a side by side herky jerky movement in a foward motion comming at an angle. His speed with his offense is his most valuble defense cause of the imcomming. Pac improved his balance with Roach which helped his overall game. He doesn't fall foward out of balace as he used to punch so now he is always in position to counter or defend himself. Look at some Chavez fights again and your hero Khan and evaluate again.

You sound like you just started to watch boxing and alot of the Chavez fights had significance.

[Titing Kabayo]

Pacquiao has everything... technical, brawler, puncher, boxer, etc... he has the skills that is hard to emulate plus extraordinary stamina, endurance, and athletism.. that makes him difficult for any textbook boxers...