Originally posted by Jloro
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Who has the better resume: Lara or GGG?
Collapse
-
Lara has a better resume than A LOT of fighters. And he has what, 20 fights or so?
Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android
Comment
-
Originally posted by Black BartyQuote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Philadel
Lara has less fights and by far a much better resume
Lara does have a better resume (especially if you count the Williams fight as a win), but not by eons. The names he beat (Trout and Angulo) are more recognizable, but are slightly overrated imo, while some of GGG's wins (Proksa, Macklin, Adama) are a little underrated. And we have to take Lara's generous draw against Molina into consideration, too.
Overall, I think Lara's resume is better, but not by the margin the posters in these thread are suggesting.
And let's remember: resumes don't fight in the ring, fighters do.
Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android
Comment
-
Originally posted by jas View Postresume is just wins.
For that reason, I should have voted for Lara. Lara has a better overall resume right now,that is correct.
If we are talking about:
1 Who would win in a fight?
2 Who has better wins?
3 Who hasn't had his ass whooooped?
That would be GGG.
Lara has had some real stinkers on tv.
Lara lost easily to Molina.(He lost at least 6 rounds.)
He fought really well vs Williams (should have won).
He showed me something vs Angulo(WARRIOR HEART,finally), and got beat up by a horrible Vanes(should have lost).
But resume includes all your fights, so Lara.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Black Barty View PostLara does have a better resume (especially if you count the Williams fight as a win), but not by eons. The names he beat (Trout and Angulo) are more recognizable, but are slightly overrated imo, while some of GGG's wins (Proksa, Macklin, Adama) are a little underrated. And we have to take Lara's generous draw against Molina into consideration, too.
Overall, I think Lara's resume is better, but not by the margin the posters in these thread are suggesting.
And let's remember: resumes don't fight in the ring, fighters do.
It's not Golovkin's fault that he can't get guys in the ring with him, but we can't give him credit for fights that didn't happen, even if he tries to make them happen.
Comment
-
Originally posted by marvelousmatt View PostNo, a resume is all the fights.
For that reason, I should have voted for Lara. Lara has a better overall resume right now,that is correct.
If we are talking about:
1 Who would win in a fight?
2 Who has better wins?
3 Who hasn't had his ass whooooped?
That would be GGG.
Lara has had some real stinkers on tv.
Lara lost easily to Molina.(He lost at least 6 rounds.)
He fought really well vs Williams (should have won).
He showed me something vs Angulo(WARRIOR HEART,finally), and got beat up by a horrible Vanes(should have lost).
But resume includes all your fights, so Lara.
but resume is still just wins.
im gonna make a thread about it.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by marvelousmattQuote:
Originally Posted by jas
resume is just wins.
No, a resume is all the fights.
For that reason, I should have voted for Lara. Lara has a better overall resume right now,that is correct.
If we are talking about :
1 Who would win in a fight?
2 Who has better wins?
3 Who hasn't had his ass whooooped?
That would be GGG.
Lara has had some real stinkers on tv.
Lara lost easily to Molina.(He lost at least 6 rounds.)
He fought really well vs Williams (should have won).
He showed me something vs Angulo(WARRIOR HEART,finally), and got beat up by a horrible Vanes(should have lost).
But resume includes all your fights, so Lara.
Seems like stupidity spreads pretty fast around here.
Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android
Comment
-
Bullrushing while hitting nothing but air and running into the ropes = beating up your opponent.
Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android
Comment
Comment