[QUOTE=JAB5239;12407924]
Call Ruiz boring, but his resume speaks for itself. His opponents are better than Vitaly's and Right up there with Wlads. This means if you consider anything the Klits have done impressive you should be 10x more impressed with Jones beating Ruiz.
Your memory is shit because what I said is that if there is no film of a fighter I use articles from the day. I'll gladly put my top 10 list up on any division against yours and explain why I came to the conclusions of each fighters ranking. Both you and I know you won't step to the plate for that challenge though, will you?
Whats you point? Neither Klit has been able to beat a great in their own division and have lost to fighters who will never sniff the HOF. Should that be overlooked and we just give them extra credit because you like them a real, real lot!?
http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/sh...d.php?t=368747
Anything else you should look up yourself before opening your mouth about things you don't know about.
And you're welcome.
Why do you keep bringing up Whitaker? The thread is "Who is the best fighter SINCE Whitaker".
Jones beating Ruiz is one of the most overhyped/overrated fights in Boxing history.
As for your list you can't accurately put it up there with just an article. It's just dumb and biased. I also explained to you how some fights on an article look spectacular and end up being a snoozefest. Example: Ali vs Liston 2
Because they dominate and they give no one a chance to be decent. Look how people hyped Haye into a messiah and only came up empty handed. What did they do? They started downgrading the win so they can hate on Wlad more. It's like people from the western world are threaten by someone else from the eastern side(who we have hated for many many years) to be great.
I didn't know you posted **** about Jones but I will read it up.
Cause people have compared him to being better than him. Duh!?!
Call Ruiz boring, but his resume speaks for itself. His opponents are better than Vitaly's and Right up there with Wlads. This means if you consider anything the Klits have done impressive you should be 10x more impressed with Jones beating Ruiz.
Your memory is shit because what I said is that if there is no film of a fighter I use articles from the day. I'll gladly put my top 10 list up on any division against yours and explain why I came to the conclusions of each fighters ranking. Both you and I know you won't step to the plate for that challenge though, will you?
Whats you point? Neither Klit has been able to beat a great in their own division and have lost to fighters who will never sniff the HOF. Should that be overlooked and we just give them extra credit because you like them a real, real lot!?
http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/sh...d.php?t=368747
Anything else you should look up yourself before opening your mouth about things you don't know about.
And you're welcome.
Why do you keep bringing up Whitaker? The thread is "Who is the best fighter SINCE Whitaker".
Jones beating Ruiz is one of the most overhyped/overrated fights in Boxing history.
As for your list you can't accurately put it up there with just an article. It's just dumb and biased. I also explained to you how some fights on an article look spectacular and end up being a snoozefest. Example: Ali vs Liston 2
Because they dominate and they give no one a chance to be decent. Look how people hyped Haye into a messiah and only came up empty handed. What did they do? They started downgrading the win so they can hate on Wlad more. It's like people from the western world are threaten by someone else from the eastern side(who we have hated for many many years) to be great.
I didn't know you posted **** about Jones but I will read it up.
Cause people have compared him to being better than him. Duh!?!
Comment