ESPN's latest P4P list

[El-blanco]

Who has Gonzalez beaten on the level of Bradley? Or for that matter, who has Mayweather beaten?

I would put Pac at number 1.

Estrada is as good as Bradley. Also destroying top competition in your division trumps going 12 rounds with guys like rios. I agree mayweather has not beaten anyone special. Roman is actually #1 in my book.

[Black Barty]

The order is arguable, but not a terrible list overall.

My only real complaint is that Froch should be there instead of GGG.

Also, I'm not comfortable with Wlad being P4P but I can't think of anyone I would replace him with. The most promising ones don't have the wins to justify a P4P ranking yet.

[////]

Also, I'm not comfortable with Wlad being P4P but I can't think of anyone I would replace him with. The most promising ones don't have the wins to justify a P4P ranking yet.

That's because you're a whacko conspiracy theorist who thinks Wlad rigs all of his fights and whatnot. I've seen your other posts. Anyone else has him p4p. Ring has him #3 p4p in the world (#2 because they have to drop Ward soon).

[gabrielmolilulu]

Good list, but I'm not agree with the order. Like Blanco said, Rigo or Gonzalez should be ahead of Marquez.

[Black Barty]

That's because you're a whacko conspiracy theorist who thinks Wlad rigs all of his fights and whatnot. I've seen your other posts. Anyone else has him p4p. Ring has him #3 p4p in the world (#2 because they have to drop Ward soon).

WTF? I don't even post about Wlad unless it's something Pulev related and I'm a big Pulev fan and Bulgarian (by ethnicity) so it's only natural Wlad isn't my favourite fighter these days (or that I didn't like Wlad fighting Leapai before Pulev).

But even if that wasn't the case, everyone has fighters they simply don't like. That doesn't make them "whacko conspiracy theorists". And I don't recall ever saying Wlad rigs his fights.

[////]

So you want him dropped out of the p4p rankings where he is universally included because you're a Pulev fan, when Pulev is about to fight him?

That makes no sense at all, but cool story.

[KO'er]

Marquez shouldn't be number 3, hell IMO Froch should be ahead of Marquez and Froch isn't even there.

I'd have Rigondeaux ahead of both Marquez and Bradley. I don't agree with Pacquiao being number 2 anymore. Going a couple of years back, he'd be number 1 or 2 for sure, but not now. Beating Brandon Rios or Chris Algieri, they're not elite.

[IMDAZED]

GGG over Klitschko.

Just a dumb list, period.

[Black Barty]

So you want him dropped out of the p4p rankings where he is universally included because you're a Pulev fan, when Pulev is about to fight him?

That makes no sense at all, but cool story.

No. I was referring to the posts you said you saw from me. I criticized him harshly for fighting Leapai first and the press conference controversy. And that's partly because I'm a Pulev fan.

I don't want him dropped from the P4P list. I'm just saying that for a P4Per, his resume is a bit weak. He has been a title holder for over 8 years and his best wins are what? Byrd, Ibragimov, Thompson, Chagaev, Chambers, Haye and Povetkin. Not much for such a long title reign. And of these guys I only recognize Byrd, Haye and maybe Povetkin as really good fighters. The others are decent at best.

But like I said, no one is accomplished enough to replace him, so I'm fine with him being P4P.

[VAGAB0ND]

This is my Top 10 P4P:

1. Mayweather
2. Klitschko
3. Pacquiao
4. Bradley
5. Marquez
6. Gonzalez
7. Froch
8. Estrada
9. Rigondeaux
10. Kovalev