Both are bad.
If a fighter is protected, then he gets bashed and pressured by fans to take on a "real" challenge.
If a fighter fights top competition too fast then "damn he got Vargas'd".
And there's really no middle competition, it's either good or bad.
Just like there are no unbiased boxing fans, they'll claim they are unbiased but you continuously see them post little cheap shots at the same fighters, over and over again.
You're either a hater or a nutthugger.
If a fighter is protected, then he gets bashed and pressured by fans to take on a "real" challenge.
If a fighter fights top competition too fast then "damn he got Vargas'd".
And there's really no middle competition, it's either good or bad.
Just like there are no unbiased boxing fans, they'll claim they are unbiased but you continuously see them post little cheap shots at the same fighters, over and over again.
You're either a hater or a nutthugger.
Comment