Originally posted by Red Cyclone
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
On a scale of 1-10 how would you rate the entertainment value of Kovalev vs Ward?
Collapse
-
-
it was a 6, and thats closer to a 5 then a 7. people giving it a 9 or 10 are deluded, wont be on any fight of the year shortlists thats for sure. just cause two top fighters were in there doesnt mean it was a top fight. there were very few clean shots landed, a fight with very few clean shots landed cant be a great fight. It was intruguing yes, but the way to view this, is if you hadnt heard of either fighter, would you be saying it was a great fight? Cause thats how to view it objectively. I think people are really kidding themselves when they say this was a great event, seen more 'rip boxing' posts online due it being uneventful and robbery, rather than people saying 'wow what a great night'. i dont think it was that bad, certainly wasnt a stinker but it wasnt great
Comment
-
Originally posted by Red Cyclone View PostFor reviewing purpose I would watch it but not for the sake of wanting to watch it, I did enjoy Kovalev boxing he was very well tuned in for this fight and he gave Ward a good bit of a schooling from the outside.
I had low expectations of the match coming in and it turned out to be an intriguing match.
Definitely looking forward to a rematch though.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by bigdramashow View Postit was a 6, and thats closer to a 5 then a 7. people giving it a 9 or 10 are deluded, wont be on any fight of the year shortlists thats for sure. just cause two top fighters were in there doesnt mean it was a top fight. there were very few clean shots landed, a fight with very few clean shots landed cant be a great fight. It was intruguing yes, but the way to view this, is if you hadnt heard of either fighter, would you be saying it was a great fight? Cause thats how to view it objectively. I think people are really kidding themselves when they say this was a great event, seen more 'rip boxing' posts online due it being uneventful and robbery, rather than people saying 'wow what a great night'. i dont think it was that bad, certainly wasnt a stinker but it wasnt great
I thought it was brilliant, because it was being fought at a rarified level, yes if you hadn't heard of either fighter you would think it was nothing special, but I have heard of both and we know what they to do even very good fighters. The fact that they stalemated each other so much is what made it such a great watch.
The nuances, the tension, the tentativeness, and the technical level was what made it very good for a lot of us. The fact that neither guy could get a handle on the other is what it is.
Comment
-
Originally posted by sunny31 View PostSpoken like a true casual. Entertainment is different to different people, for example, all the people who box here found this fight fascinating, whereas someone who only has a passing interest or has never been in the ring would most likely find it ordinary.
I thought it was brilliant, because it was being fought at a rarified level, yes if you hadn't heard of either fighter you would think it was nothing special, but I have heard of both and we know what they to do even very good fighters. The fact that they stalemated each other so much is what made it such a great watch.
The nuances, the tension, the tentativeness, and the technical level was what made it very good for a lot of us. The fact that neither guy could get a handle on the other is what it is.
Comment
-
I still think Salido/Vargas is fight of the year so far but this fight had more drama for me. I'd give this fight a 10 on first viewing. I doubt I'll watch it again because I think it was a bad decision and rewatching it will only piss me off again.
Kinda like Castillo/Corrales, I turn it off after the 2nd Corrales KD.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bojangles1987 View PostSolid 8 or 9, and I'm only docking points because I know casual fans may want more excitement than this. From a pure analytical standpoint, as a hardcore fan, this was a 10.
Comment
Comment