There is really no legitimate argument that Floyd nuthuggers can do to spin this. The Facts speak for themselves!
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Pacquiao has beaten twice the number of current top 10 p4p that Mayweather has.
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Da Hammer View PostThere is really no legitimate argument that Floyd nuthuggers can do to spin this. The Facts speak for themselves!
Bbbbbbbut....... Judah was p4p when the fight was signed .........
Yeah bud, but he lost to Carlos fricken Baldomir before he fought Floyd, with no fights in between = bye bye p4p.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jim Jeffries View PostSorry chump, but Castillo was not top 10 p4p when Floyd fought him. He didn't crack the top 10 until 2 or 3 years later.
And of course, you left off Morales.
Castillo made the list afterwards. how does that not count? did castillo improve after his losses to mayweather? he was the same fighter he just accomplished more. that should count.
logically speaking, castillo should count.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by kswizzy99 View PostI was sure that morales wasn't on the list because he lost to raheem. but I've been told that he still was on the list after the loss. I don't have proof of that so I didn't add him.
Castillo made the list afterwards. how does that not count? did castillo improve after his losses to mayweather? he was the same fighter he just accomplished more. that should count.
logically speaking, castillo should count.
Comment
-
Originally posted by mitruth View PostThe topic itself is kinda pulling at straws no? What difference does it really make?
Comment
-
Originally posted by kswizzy99 View PostI was sure that morales wasn't on the list because he lost to raheem. but I've been told that he still was on the list after the loss. I don't have proof of that so I didn't add him.
Castillo made the list afterwards. how does that not count? did castillo improve after his losses to mayweather? he was the same fighter he just accomplished more. that should count.
logically speaking, castillo should count.
it had marco in the top 10 still even though he lost to manny because he just beat erik who was top 10 as well.
they couldn't take manny off when he lost to erik because he just beat marco 16 months earlier.
they couldn't take erik off when he lost to raheem because they had manny on the list still and erik just beat him.
in the end ring just left all 3 on the list. they took erik off after he lost to manny in the rematch.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jim Jeffries View PostSo Clinton Mitchell should get credit for beating an ATG in Bernard Hopkins? Did you just say "logically speaking?"
Castillo was like 50 fights into his career and he didn't really IMPROVE after his losses to pbf. He was the same.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jim Jeffries View PostWell since most *****s discredit every single Pac win and think he shouldn't even be compared to Mayweather in terms of accomplishments, etc. How about more linear titles? Twice the number of wins over current p4pers? etc. If you don't think it makes a difference, don't really care. Why post in the thread?
all I'm doing here is stating the truth.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jim Jeffries View PostWell since most *****s discredit every single Pac win and think he shouldn't even be compared to Mayweather in terms of accomplishments, etc. How about more linear titles? Twice the number of wins over current p4pers? etc. If you don't think it makes a difference, don't really care. Why post in the thread?
Comment
Comment