Originally posted by res
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Which HWs past and present would have had a good chance of beating a 70s Foreman?
Collapse
-
-
-
Originally posted by Yaman View PostThat concept is called 'excuses' for most cases. Blatant, pathetic excuses. I'm sorry but he's not getting a free pass from me.
You know man, it takes quite some nerve to just drop an argument to come back and mock it later without addressing it properly.
I guess Monte Cox is on Foreman's nuts too?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Capaedia View PostI guess Meldrick Taylor's loss to Chavez didn't affect him either.
You know man, it takes quite some nerve to just drop an argument to come back and mock it later without addressing it properly.
I guess Monte Cox is on Foreman's nuts too?
You again. I do not feel like making big posts trying to convince someone who has made up his mind already and is that biased. I actually don't think Foreman's first loss was irrelevant in terms of its effects, but to claim that it was the SOLE reason for his displays against Young & Lyle? That is absolutely laughable and screams bias. You seem to undermine ANY negative displays of 'prime Foreman' as it being something HE did wrong himself instead of crediting his opponent, or making excuses for his bad performances or losses. The whole goal is to make young George seem as invincible as possible.
And So was Foreman beaten to a pulp like Taylor now? What are you gonna mention next, Jess Willard was never the same again after the Dempsey fight just like George?Last edited by BKM-; 08-14-2012, 08:41 PM.
Comment
-
Comment