Originally posted by hugh grant
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
PAC loss to BRADLEY: Would Legacy be Tarnished??
Collapse
-
Originally posted by hugh grant View PostPAC is top 20 to top 10 depending on who u talk to right now. Jmm and gfloyd loss don't effect PACs standing. Loss to jmm gave people the ammunition to suggest PAC is overrated, but he came back well from that loss, to suggest reversing the idea that he was overestimated would be sensible thing to do!
If he were to lose to Bradley again people would claim PAC was overrated. But then again there are enough people who remember what PAC was and assume PAC just lost the desire to fight and was more politician right now because anyone knows peak PAC only loses to Bradley in your dreams
But PAC is taking a risk. Bradley is a very good fighter and if you give very goog fighter 3 chances to beat you, they might get lucky*cough cough jmm*
Only about 6 min long.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=2OXYhyyAIMc
Comment
-
Nah, Manny is just another case like Klitschko, a fighter who stuck around longer than he should have done eventually losing to a guy he would have mopped 2-3 year earlier. Everyone knows who the better fighter is Bradley is younger and fresher, and on an upwards curve, Manny is on a fall and I expect hasn't the desire like he hadn't versus Floyd.
Comment
-
-
It wouldn't tarnish it too much but it would tarnish it a small amount for me. Pacquiao is 36 and well past prime and he already beat Bradley easily twice when he was younger on my score card. Joe Louis got KOed by Marciano and Ali got KOed by Holmes. They were no older than Pacquiao is now and it didn't tarnish their legacy. If a KO loss didn't tarnish their legacies why should Pacquiao losing by KO at the same age tarnish his legacy?
Comment
-
Originally posted by boliodogs View PostIt wouldn't tarnish it too much but it would tarnish it a small amount for me. Pacquiao is 36 and well past prime and he already beat Bradley easily twice when he was younger on my score card. Joe Louis got KOed by Marciano and Ali got KOed by Holmes. They were no older than Pacquiao is now and it didn't tarnish their legacy. If a KO loss didn't tarnish their legacies why should Pacquiao losing by KO at the same age tarnish his legacy?
I don't want to see PAC go that route. I don't want to see any boxer go out like that.
Comment
-
It wouldn't tarnish his career, but the record will show Bradley got the better of him twice, regardless of how you feel about the first fight. It does much more for Bradley, being the man who put Pacquiao HOF career to rest.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Zaroku View PostI guess it is hard to forget one's glory days. Some fight for Glory, others Paydays. Louis had to keep fighting to pay tax bills. That is a shame.
I don't want to see PAC go that route. I don't want to see any boxer go out like that.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Zaroku View PostI am curious to know how boxing fans and historian's would look at PAC's Legacy? Any Guesses?
After all, PAC's KO loss to Marquez was very significant.
PAC's decision loss to Floyd in the biggest fight our era is significant.
How would a KO victory for Bradley look on his resume?
I don't expect it to happen, but this is boxing!
If Bradlley were to clearly beat PAC, how would that impact his legacy???
Comment
Comment