Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Successful fighters who are unskilled

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by hectari View Post
    The onus is on Bradley to shine, everyone keeps putting the blame on Pacman oh he couldnt finish a one foot Bradley, well Bradley couldnt knockout a past prime Pacquiao.

    When Pacquiao was given his moment he delivered and that was against Oscar De La Hoya, against Hatton, against Barrera, against Cotto, that is why he drew millions, Bradley got his moment and he cowered and fought safe and scary, not like a guy who wanted to be remembered as a great.

    In these fights the blame goes on the younger lion trying to make a name for himself, Bradley failed to impress not Pacquiao.

    Pacquiao actually look good, compare his fight with Bradley a top undefeated guy in his prime and he barely got hit, Floyd fought a bloated and washed up Cotto and expected an easy fight and he said in his post fight he was his toughest fight.

    Pacquiao wasn't as active but Bradley didn't even try to win, dude looked in survival mode that is why he busted his ankle from back stepping so fast and not planting his foot right.
    This argument is about skill, which Bradley showed whether he got a gift or didn't impress with one leg (god forbid). The fact you bring up Floyd fighting a bloated Cotto; Pacquiaos record, which is no need to mention Pacquiao trying to bloat up Marquez and his lack of skills got his A$$ Knocked out.
    SKILLS are what we are speaking of, So the argument Bradley is skill-less is a rediculous notion.

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by puga View Post
      depends on how you define skilled.. to idiots skilled is prety much being pure boxers .. or defensive oriented fighters


      to me , skillled offensive fighters >>>>>>>>>>skilled defensive fighters
      "The best offense is a good defense", not been a saying for who knows how long; for *****$ and giggles!

      Comment


      • #63
        Lacking 'textbook boxing ability' would be more appropriate,unskilled fighters are not succesful

        Comment


        • #64
          The most skillful are those that win

          Theres a difference between skill and technicality.

          Comment


          • #65
            Butterbean.

            Comment


            • #66
              To say that Chavez Jr. is unskilled or "lacks textbook boxing ability" is utterly ridiculous and trivial.

              Watch the Peter Manfredo fight. He was an excellent boxer puncher, showed great head movement and counter punching.

              Now watch the Rubio fight. He swarmed him effectively and beat him down.

              For some strange reason he decided to become a pothead for the biggest fight of his career and he paid for it, but even then he almost KO'ed Martinez.

              Don't let your hate for him cloud your judgement on his skills. He's not the most skilled by a long shot but the guy's got skills.

              Comment


              • #67
                hatton

                danny garcia

                andre bertoids

                angulo

                current b-Hop (literally using headbutts incorporated in his combos)

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by BigAlexSand View Post
                  "The best offense is a good defense", not been a saying for who knows how long; for *****$ and giggles!
                  actually , it's the opposite .. offense score points , not defense

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X
                  TOP