Past fights in which you felt the scorecards where so bad, it could of been fixed?

[noekin3]

Whitaker-Ramirez 1
Whitaker-Chavez
Harold Johnson - Willie Pastrano

How Harold Johnson - Ezzard Charles was only an SD win for Johnson I don't know.

Dick Tiger- Emile Griffith 1 I felt was close but I felt Tiger won the fight by close but clear decision but not all that mad that Griffith winning.

Ramirez deserved the win against Arguello despite my card being much closer than most people have it. But Ramirez did win, really.

My god this guy was good......anyways Taylor vs Chavez .....before the ko was a schooling of taylor and if i remember the cards was split decision to taylor ....split!!!! naaaaa......

[horge]

Whitaker vs de la hoya whitaker was robbed

I used to think that too, until quite recently.
Then I came around to seeing how the judges may have seen it.
Sure, Pea put on a master class of D at times, but he didn't hit
Oscar enough. Slipping punches is great, but landing is what the
scorecards are supposed to reflect, and in terms of offense, Mr.
Fishnets did appear to be the busier of the two