Performance in fights or win/loss ratio?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
How do you measure greatness?
Collapse
-
-
I ask because personally for example I consider augustus a great fighter and he's faced good competition as well, has a ridiculous loss record but never fails to entertain and has skills without question, a knock perhaps is his lack of power but that in turn made him box more, entertain more etc. etc.
Comment
-
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by -PITO- View PostI ask because personally for example I consider augustus a great fighter and he's faced good competition as well, has a ridiculous loss record but never fails to entertain and has skills without question, a knock perhaps is his lack of power but that in turn made him box more, entertain more etc. etc.
Comment
-
Obviously you should judge a fighter's greatness based on how often they fought the best and how they performed when they did.
Comment
-
It's all in how you win and who you did it to. I dig stories like the little poem about Yankee Sullivan in my sig. Mostly a fan of the hardness of the 1800's.
Comment
Comment