Originally posted by 1bad65
View Post
The thinking behind it is, that by charging banks for certain deposits in their reserves that it'll encourage banks to lend to consumers, and small businesses to try and stimulate growth. This is obviously risky (some would say lunacy) because it brings a very real risk of deflation.
What's often overlooked when they talk about QE is, that the money that's created has only been given to the banks, to puff up their reserves, it hasn't been put back into the economy, that's the primary reason the hyper-inflation that many predicted would happen when QE began hasn't happened.
The best thing that could've happened in 2008 is, instead of giving trillions to the financial sector to keep the gravy train running, that money should've been given to the public to pay off some of their debts, and to spend into the economy. The banks would've still received money through debt repayments. The too big to exist financial institutions should've then been broken up, and Glass-Stiegel reinstated. Instead, we remain on the brink of economic disaster with even bigger debt bubbles than in 2008, all to maintain the status quo.
Comment