Tweet
George Groves not happy with 15%; will lobby IBF for more
The Carl Froch v George Groves rematch saga rumbles on. Groves is lobbying the IBF again, this time regarding their ruling which relates to a minimum 15 per cent of the purse for a challenger who is not at the top of their rankings.
It was reported that Hammersmith’s Groves was offered a seven figure sum by Matchroom, albeit with options, before the outcome of his first IBF appeal which ruled that he should rematch with Carl Froch within 90 days due to the unsatisfactory ending to their previous contest, which, it was considered, was stopped prematurely.
However, because Groves is not the IBF’s ‘top rated’ challenger (positions 1 and 2 are ‘Not Rated’ at present - Brandon Gonzales, Maksim Vlasov and James DeGale sit above 6th placed Groves), their ruling means that Groves receives a minimum of 15 per cent of the purse. So he’s going back to the IBF with trainer Paddy Fitzpatrick to try and carve a bigger slice.
Promoter Eddie Hearn, who appears to be having difficulties getting this one in the can, said:
"Right now the IBF have ordered the rematch to take place, they have ordered an 85-15 split and George Groves has appealed that split."
"We have until February the 4th to come to some sort of agreement or the fight will go out to purse bids.
"So if the Groves thing drags out, we could be ‘forced’ into looking into the (Chavez Jr) option."
It seems the only person keen on a fight with Chavez Jnr is Froch, and that’s understandable. For the Groves rematch, Arsenal’s Emirates Stadium (60,000) and Nottingham’s City Ground (30,000) have been mooted as possible venues recently. The UK fans demand for the fight is indeed huge, but Froch still has their boos ringing in his ears and given his dislike for Groves, you just can’t see him giving any financial quarter.
The IBF could well adjust their ruling in Groves’ favour - it wouldn’t be completely out of character for a sanctioning body to make it up as it went along. Getting the fight on is in its interests, and it’s got bills to pay.
A purse bid situation could be interesting but bad news for Matchroom/SKY and would probably see Froch vacate the title. An IBF spokesperson said: “If for some reason Froch gave up the title then we would order the two highest-rated guys to fight for the vacant belt. Since we already ordered Groves to fight Froch, he would be likely to be one of the guys to fight for that vacant title.”
A vacant title usually means a 50-50 purse split, but it’s doubtful that 50 per cent of anything is bigger than 15 per cent of the Froch rematch at the moment. Although a rematch with James DeGale for the belt could maybe come close, and there would be no shortage of promoters willing to stage it.
If the IBF don’t change their minds, it’s deal or no deal for Groves, but he should have plenty of options regardless.
http://news.boxrec.com/news/2014/geo...-happy-15-cent
It was reported that Hammersmith’s Groves was offered a seven figure sum by Matchroom, albeit with options, before the outcome of his first IBF appeal which ruled that he should rematch with Carl Froch within 90 days due to the unsatisfactory ending to their previous contest, which, it was considered, was stopped prematurely.
However, because Groves is not the IBF’s ‘top rated’ challenger (positions 1 and 2 are ‘Not Rated’ at present - Brandon Gonzales, Maksim Vlasov and James DeGale sit above 6th placed Groves), their ruling means that Groves receives a minimum of 15 per cent of the purse. So he’s going back to the IBF with trainer Paddy Fitzpatrick to try and carve a bigger slice.
Promoter Eddie Hearn, who appears to be having difficulties getting this one in the can, said:
"Right now the IBF have ordered the rematch to take place, they have ordered an 85-15 split and George Groves has appealed that split."
"We have until February the 4th to come to some sort of agreement or the fight will go out to purse bids.
"So if the Groves thing drags out, we could be ‘forced’ into looking into the (Chavez Jr) option."
It seems the only person keen on a fight with Chavez Jnr is Froch, and that’s understandable. For the Groves rematch, Arsenal’s Emirates Stadium (60,000) and Nottingham’s City Ground (30,000) have been mooted as possible venues recently. The UK fans demand for the fight is indeed huge, but Froch still has their boos ringing in his ears and given his dislike for Groves, you just can’t see him giving any financial quarter.
The IBF could well adjust their ruling in Groves’ favour - it wouldn’t be completely out of character for a sanctioning body to make it up as it went along. Getting the fight on is in its interests, and it’s got bills to pay.
A purse bid situation could be interesting but bad news for Matchroom/SKY and would probably see Froch vacate the title. An IBF spokesperson said: “If for some reason Froch gave up the title then we would order the two highest-rated guys to fight for the vacant belt. Since we already ordered Groves to fight Froch, he would be likely to be one of the guys to fight for that vacant title.”
A vacant title usually means a 50-50 purse split, but it’s doubtful that 50 per cent of anything is bigger than 15 per cent of the Froch rematch at the moment. Although a rematch with James DeGale for the belt could maybe come close, and there would be no shortage of promoters willing to stage it.
If the IBF don’t change their minds, it’s deal or no deal for Groves, but he should have plenty of options regardless.
http://news.boxrec.com/news/2014/geo...-happy-15-cent
Comment