I thought he was one of the best I don't pay to much attention to p4p though. I thought he beat Taylor and Hopkins also.
Interesting.A valid argument can be made for him beating Taylor (i actually scored it for winky) but i thought hopkins clearly edged him in a very ugly fight
Interesting.A valid argument can be made for him beating Taylor (i actually scored it for winky) but i thought hopkins clearly edged him in a very ugly fight
It was my impression that he out pointed Hopkins but It was a while back and I have not watched it again. I remember Hopkins doing a lot of holding but I thought Winky out boxed him.
It was my impression that he out pointed Hopkins but It was a while back and I have not watched it again. I remember Hopkins doing a lot of holding but I thought Winky out boxed him.
Too be fair its been a long time since i watched it,i know it was ugly and winky had a nasty gash after a clash of heads,might rewatch now actually
I think Hopkins is a very strategic manipulative person. He is capable of making it look like he wins rounds when he does not.
I don't really understand your point. "Winning rounds" is subjective, so if it looks like he won a round to you, he did. He might get out-worked and out-landed, but if you think his aggression was more effective, he wins. Now his strategy and tactics are very effective at blunting his opponent's aggression. I think that that ability can cost him rounds that he might think he won and I might think he won. A lot of people just scored aggressiveness, not effective aggressiveness.
Comment