Tweet
When I'm done reading here I'm going to the "aliens" built the pyramids" thread for more interesting reading
-
-
JMM marks up easily. Probably his biggest weakness.Originally posted by QUELOQUE View Post9/11
Not a big fan of AP, but he would've whooped Soto. Not to worry, Barrera will lump Soto's face up like he did JMM a few years back
.
Soto should win at least 9 rounds easy.
As for AP, the only thing he whoops is insomnia.
Comment
-
About the impact and design.Originally posted by Saucy Jacky View PostWell, that was only one person. There is plenty of others who are architects and engineers.
The sad part of all this is that you don't need to be a professor or an architect to be able to see what happened. Its not that hard to figure out. The buildings fell at free fall speed (bye bye official pancake theory).
And building 7 was not hit by any planes and came down at free fall speed in classic controlled demolition fashion.
To your notion that "we've never seen buildings hit by planes like that" or whatever. For someone who supposedly believes in evidence and science you sure ignore engineering.
The architects of those buildings have mentioned numerous times that the buildings were designed to withstand multiple impacts from 767's. Maybe they were overpaid. They should've hired you to build them huh?
The two towers were the first structures outside of the military and nuclear industries designed to resist the impact of a jet airliner, the Boeing 707. It was assumed that the jetliner would be lost in the fog, seeking to land at JFK or at Newark.
The Boeing 707 that was considered in the design of the towers was estimated to have a gross weight of 263,000 pounds and a flight speed of 180 mph as it approached an airport; the Boeing 767-200ER aircraft that were used to attack the towers had an estimated gross weight of 274,000 pounds and flight speeds of 470 to 590 mph upon impact.
Originally posted by -D33Pwaters- View PostThere is a formula to work this out:
Galileo's law of falling bodies.
d=1/2gt^2
South tower d= 1,362 ft (415.0 m)
g=9.81
Then solve to find "t":
415=0.5*9.81*t^2
t=9.1982........ 9.2 seconds
what do you think?
Comment
-
Bubba Chunday, comment in my thread to..........
http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/sh...d.php?t=403686Comment
-
-
FAO conspiracy theorists:
Comment
-
laughable.Originally posted by Bubba Chunday View Post
All the other buildings surrounding the towers, that were smaller than WTC 7 are left standing despite being virtually destroyed and WTC 7 comes down in symmetrical form with only a few fires burning in it.
Ok pal.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Saucy Jacky View Postlaughable.
All the other buildings surrounding the towers, that were smaller than WTC 7 are left standing despite being virtually destroyed and WTC 7 comes down in symmetrical form with only a few fires burning in it.
Ok pal.
Comment
-
Apparently WTC7 took the biggest hit, and because it was so big collapsed the way it did. When there is significant damage to the lower floors the massive amount of weight brings the building straight down.Originally posted by Saucy Jacky View Postlaughable.
All the other buildings surrounding the towers, that were smaller than WTC 7 are left standing despite being virtually destroyed and WTC 7 comes down in symmetrical form with only a few fires burning in it.
Ok pal.
Comment
-
That's not very convincing especially since it steel reinforced.Originally posted by Bubba Chunday View Post
In bold: yes apparently. It didn't look like much to me. The fires were minute compared to North and South towers.
How do you know there was significant damage to the lower floors?
Even if there was, I doubt the building would fall down symmetrical into it's own blueprint. The fact is, WTC 7 fell down through the path of greatest resistance. The explanation you're giving isn't consistent with the symmetrical collapse of the building.
also you still haven't addressed the point he made about the other surrounding WTC's which were still left standing.Comment
Comment