Originally posted by JDezi4
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Judges shouldn't score fights from ringside anymore
Collapse
-
Last edited by jaded; 11-10-2013, 07:28 PM.
-
Originally posted by jaded View PostThis is my point...if you were sitting up close what your eyes saw is what happened. If you are sitting ringside you will see small details that you wouldn't see otherwise like maybe eyes rolling for a brief second. That is why sometimes it looks like the ref stops a fight prematurely on TV because he standing right next to the guy and sees his eyes roll...he knows the guy's in trouble yet you at home thinks it was an early stoppage because there is no way the camera picked that up.
In the final moments of Corrales vs Castillo, in once camera angle, it looked like the fight was stopped prematurely... Yes
But thanks to the resource of having another camera angle handy, you could see Castillo was out on his feet
That's the whole point, man... MULTIPLE CAMERA ANGLES... THAT is the advantage
Comment
-
Originally posted by JDezi4 View PostAaaahh... A Bradley fan I see...
Lol, JK
If you take certain facts out of the sport,I just believe it becomes less interesting..
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rome-By-Ko View PostLMAO,but for real tho..Sometimes people see a different fight,and have a different perspective..I mean last night and fights like Lara Pwill are so obvious,so I can understand why people get mad at those kinda cards in fights like that..
If you take certain facts out of the sport,I just believe it becomes less interesting..
It's all still there... Close fights can still be made interesting
Just horse**** robberies lose all credibility, no more claims of seeing things different, no more claims of being influenced by the crowd... Just obvious corruption, and hopefully more curb kicking
Comment
Comment