Originally posted by TURKOGLU
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Nobody can speak for what's "good for boxing"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by insipiens View PostWas Tyson "good for boxing?" Some assume 'yes', some think more carefully and say 'no'. I think most carefully and dismiss the question and misstated.
Comment
-
You gotta understand the psychology of this ****, you fuсking coward.
Fights and fighters that can get the attention of people who aren't fight fans turn them into fans.
Anytime you can make a fan out of someone who never before gave a **** about boxing...
...IT'S GOOD FOR BOXING.
Comment
-
Originally posted by kswizzy99 View Postyou dismiss the question? tyson has like 8 of the top 10 highest selling pay-per-views of all-time. you know what that means? he attracted people to boxing such as myself. without tyson, I don't know if I would have even been a boxing fan.
Comment
-
Originally posted by TURKOGLU View PostYou gotta understand the psychology of this ****, you fuсking coward.
Fights and fighters that can get the attention of people who aren't fight fans turn them into fans.
Anytime you can make a fan out of someone who never before gave a **** about boxing...
...IT'S GOOD FOR BOXING.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by insipiens View PostIs it good for boxing that the illiterates on this site troll about Paul Williams or David Haye?
Take Super_Lightweight for example.
The dude fuсking stopped watching boxing because Roy Jones Jr. got destroyed and he's shot.
Comment
Comment