I started a thread on why do people called PBF a runner....., And made points on how:
If I threw something at your head, hopefully you would have the wherewithal to move out of the way. ...
Or
Would you Stand there get hit to prove that you are not scared of the object throne at you, and then throw something Back....?
************************************************** ****
Naturally the thought came in my head,
that most Mexican fighters who identify themselves as warriors do this and get praise as Warriors.....
Julio C.Chavez, Margarito, Morralles,etc....
and if you dont take Punishment to give Punishment, you are a Runner...!
and their fans agree with that....
So basically in other not to be a runner do you have to take Punishment to give Punishment....?
If so:
My question would be if you like boxers who stand there and get hit without moving do you care about your fighter ?
Theory:
************************************************** ****
So when they fight a fighter who dont take Punishment to give Punishment... Instead Avoid Punishment to give Punishment
This explains the reason why they tend to called them runners....
and I think it coralates down to their fans, because than their fans called them runners...
************************************************** ****
But is that smart...?
Looking at the history of past fighters...., such as Ali, and Hearns, and thousands of other fighters....
My belief would be if you dont want to hand serious health problems in the future.... You should avoid as much Punishment as possible, and give as punishment as possible...
Therefore
taking Punishment to give Punishment is probably the dumbest thing you could do as a fighter..
Am I wrong to have that belief..?
************************************************** ****
If I threw something at your head, hopefully you would have the wherewithal to move out of the way. ...
Or
Would you Stand there get hit to prove that you are not scared of the object throne at you, and then throw something Back....?
************************************************** ****
Naturally the thought came in my head,
that most Mexican fighters who identify themselves as warriors do this and get praise as Warriors.....
Julio C.Chavez, Margarito, Morralles,etc....
and if you dont take Punishment to give Punishment, you are a Runner...!
and their fans agree with that....
So basically in other not to be a runner do you have to take Punishment to give Punishment....?
If so:
My question would be if you like boxers who stand there and get hit without moving do you care about your fighter ?
Theory:
************************************************** ****
So when they fight a fighter who dont take Punishment to give Punishment... Instead Avoid Punishment to give Punishment
This explains the reason why they tend to called them runners....
and I think it coralates down to their fans, because than their fans called them runners...
************************************************** ****
But is that smart...?
Looking at the history of past fighters...., such as Ali, and Hearns, and thousands of other fighters....
My belief would be if you dont want to hand serious health problems in the future.... You should avoid as much Punishment as possible, and give as punishment as possible...
Therefore
taking Punishment to give Punishment is probably the dumbest thing you could do as a fighter..
Am I wrong to have that belief..?
************************************************** ****
Comment