Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

WBC Tries To Save Pacquiao-Barrera Rematch

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • WBC Tries To Save Pacquiao-Barrera Rematch

    WBC president Jose Sulaiman called Filipino ring idol Manny Pacquiao Tuesday in an effort to salvage a possible super featherweight title fight with reigning champion Marco Antonio Barrera.

    The overseas call from Mexico City demonstrated the WBC president’s keen interest in seeing the rematch between Pacquiao and Barrera take place in the midst of a legal battle between Oscar De La Hoya’s Golden Boy Promotions and Bob Arum’s Top Rank over who has the legal right to promote Pacquiao’s fights.

    The lawsuit filed by Golden Boy against Top Rank for tortuous interference followed Pacquiao’s signing of a seven-fight contract in mid-September and Arum’s subsequent inking of a four-year deal with Pacquiao and Pacquiao’s recent announcement that his promoter was Arum.

    As a result of the conflict between bitter rivals De La Hoya and Arum, a 50-50 offer initially made to Pacquiao by Golden Boy CEO Richard Schaefer was rejected by Top Rank with Arum making a counter-offer of $2.5 million to Barrera plus a percentage of pay-per-view revenues beyond a certain point. Pacquiao’s manager Shelly Finkel also entered the fray and said he would guarantee Pacquiao a minimum of $5 million to fight Barrera.

    Schaefer said they didn’t have to respond to Arum’s offer since their contention was Top Rank was not the promoter of Pacquiao while Arum insisted that Finkel had signed a waiver last August and was no longer Pacquiao’s manager.

    Sulaiman obviously stepped into the picture in the face of Golden Boy’s announced title clash between Barrera and Juan Manuel Marquez on March 17 at the MGM Grand in Las Vegas which the WBC is apparently reluctant to sanction since Pacquiao is the mandatory challenger. However, in the wake of the Golden Boy lawsuit and counter suit by Top Rank asking a Las Vegas court to decide on which promotional contract was valid and the absence of any ruling by the courts up to now, Sulaiman who called for a purse bid on January 12 called off the purse bid until the WBC itself because of the lawsuits.

    Sulaiman has been challenged to strip Barrera of the title should he not defend it against Pacquiao but Sulaiman himself is not inclined to take such drastic action because Barrera wants the rematch in order to avenge his November 2003 demolition at the hands of the Filipino southpaw and its not his fault if the fight doesn’t push through but the fault of the contending promoters.

    -From BS Main Page-

  • #2
    This is an open book and we already know this ****. But what caught my attention was this:

    As a result of the conflict between bitter rivals De La Hoya and Arum, a 50-50 offer initially made to Pacquiao by Golden Boy CEO Richard Schaefer was rejected by Top Rank with Arum making a counter-offer of $2.5 million to Barrera plus a percentage of pay-per-view revenues beyond a certain point
    I knew Arum announced the offer of $ 2.5 Million to MAB the same day Pacquiao announced that he is with TOP RANK and GBP responded by making their counter offer directly to Pacquiao.

    Well how come the writer of the article has it the other way around?
    Last edited by psychopath; 01-09-2007, 07:39 PM.

    Comment


    • #3
      Of course the WBC wants to try and salvage this fight. Afterall they don't want to miss out on those big sanctioning fees the bout will bring in.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by mic573 View Post
        Of course the WBC wants to try and salvage this fight. Afterall they don't want to miss out on those big sanctioning fees the bout will bring in.
        And that's also the reason why it's not most likely that WBC is gonna strip MAB of the title, the sanctioning fee.

        Comment


        • #5
          The most ****ed up part of this all is that Paquiao isnt even the mandatory it's Soto! Soto Vs Juarez was the eliminator for the mandatory at the WBC belt and thats been a long time ago.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by SAN D13GO VILLAN View Post
            The most ****ed up part of this all is that Paquiao isnt even the mandatory it's Soto! Soto Vs Juarez was the eliminator for the mandatory at the WBC belt and thats been a long time ago.
            Well it's really confusing because WBC also sanctioned the Pac/MOrales fight as an eliminator for the WBC title. So who is who now? AS openly published everywhere it's suppose to be Pac as the no 1 challenger.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by SAN D13GO VILLAN View Post
              The most ****ed up part of this all is that Paquiao isnt even the mandatory it's Soto! Soto Vs Juarez was the eliminator for the mandatory at the WBC belt and thats been a long time ago.
              Soto and Rocky fought each other at featherweight, not super featherweight.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by loui_ludwig View Post
                Soto and Rocky fought each other at featherweight, not super featherweight.
                Oh Okay. So how did Soto became the no 2 challenger behind Pacquiao at 130?

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by psychopath View Post
                  Oh Okay. So how did Soto became the no 2 challenger behind Pacquiao at 130?
                  Soto moved up to super featherweight last year. But have no idea how he became #2. Got to be politics.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by psychopath View Post
                    Well it's really confusing because WBC also sanctioned the Pac/MOrales fight as an eliminator for the WBC title. So who is who now? AS openly published everywhere it's suppose to be Pac as the no 1 challenger.

                    as far as I know its the winner of Pac/Morales who will be the mandatory for MAB, as decided after the latest WBC Convention.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP