Tweet
How the scoring system works...
Points based upon performance and/or victory:
10-Flawless/Shutout
9-Impressive
8-Comprehensive
7-Solid
6-OK
5-Mediocre/Poor
-Going by a fighters last 3 performances, with fighters most recent performance score, last in list.
*Mayweather is included in the rankings, because he is on a hiatus and is widely expected to return sometime in 2016, despite his announced retirement.
Thurman: 9,8,6=23
Pacquiao: 9,10,7=26
Bradley: 6,8,9=23
Brook: 9,6,7=22
Khan: 9,10,5=24
Porter: 7,7,8=22
Mayweather: 9,8,10=27
Garcia: 7,5,8=20
Sadam Ali: 6,7,7=20
Algieri: 5,7,7=19
Rankings Based upon Scores:
1) Mayweather
2) Pacquiao
3) Khan
4) Bradley
5) Thurman
6) Brook
7) Porter
8) Garcia
9) Sadam Ali
10) Algieri
From using my method, I would in reality,maybe have Khan switched in places with Bradley, and Porter moved up the table a couple of notches.
Do you agree with these rankings? What is your ranking, based on this points method?
Points based upon performance and/or victory:
10-Flawless/Shutout
9-Impressive
8-Comprehensive
7-Solid
6-OK
5-Mediocre/Poor
-Going by a fighters last 3 performances, with fighters most recent performance score, last in list.
*Mayweather is included in the rankings, because he is on a hiatus and is widely expected to return sometime in 2016, despite his announced retirement.
Thurman: 9,8,6=23
Pacquiao: 9,10,7=26
Bradley: 6,8,9=23
Brook: 9,6,7=22
Khan: 9,10,5=24
Porter: 7,7,8=22
Mayweather: 9,8,10=27
Garcia: 7,5,8=20
Sadam Ali: 6,7,7=20
Algieri: 5,7,7=19
Rankings Based upon Scores:
1) Mayweather
2) Pacquiao
3) Khan
4) Bradley
5) Thurman
6) Brook
7) Porter
8) Garcia
9) Sadam Ali
10) Algieri
From using my method, I would in reality,maybe have Khan switched in places with Bradley, and Porter moved up the table a couple of notches.
Do you agree with these rankings? What is your ranking, based on this points method?