Does a fighter having a 0 in the loss column make you mad?

[Vasyl’s dad]

I know, stupid question, but another poster said 0s on someones record might make people mad.

Is there any logic to this?

[Bronard]

It does when in reality they should have 2.

Other than that, nope.

[Tuavale]

I know, stupid question, but another poster said 0s on someones record might make people mad.

Is there any logic to this?

None, whatsoever

[Hougigo]

When they flaunt it without having faced any challenges, it just makes them look ******ed

[totalstranga]

When it's Timothy Bradley it sure makes alot of ppl mad

[..WaRSpencE..]

When they flaunt it without having faced any challenges, it just makes them look ******ed

BOOM!..

really, that's all I'm sayin..

[jtcs1981]

I know, stupid question, but another poster said 0s on someones record might make people mad.

Is there any logic to this?

Nothing that poster says have any logic. He is a fan boy and he will defend his idiotic opinion with his childish assumptions.

[-MAKAVELLI-]

Frank Sucketts is a ******

[285Kid]

"Boxing now is all about being undefeated, undefeated, undefeated and I think that might have a lot to do with the network just wanting to promote undefeated fighters. But what happens is the best fights don't happen because a guy don't want to take any chance of losing his undefeated record, so his biggest challenge, he don't take on that challenge because he's afraid his 0 will go. It does not create the best fights". -- Glen Johnson

Being Undefeated is great for television networks and promoters, Its doesn't get me mad

[boliodogs]

I never heard of being undefeated as a reason to dislike a fighter. That's stupid. If it's a guy like Broner who has never fought anybody that good and makes a huge deal out of his 0 I can see why that would make someone mad. If Broner would shut up and fight top fighters I think boxing fans would love him.