I love Lennon and there are many reasons to give him praise, is the the best you could find?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
John Lennon on the Malthusian hoax of overpopulation
Collapse
-
Originally posted by INSECT View PostHow come you're an intellectual coward who needs someone with a PHD to tell him what to believe?
I guess if its not state sanctioned or validated, its not true.
Comment
-
Originally posted by squealpiggy View PostI applaud the intellectual courage you display by relying on a fat DJ to tell him what to believe instead.
The West wastes more food than the entire third world can eat.
If you think that the world is overpopulated its probably because you live in a crowded urban center.
There is plenty of land in the rural areas that are inhabitable but aren't because they're owned by people like Ted Turner, probably a hero of yours because he believes the planet is overcrowded.
Yes, overcrowded while he owns entire states in the U.S.
Comment
-
Originally posted by INSECT View PostI applaud your attempts at changing the topic because you have no argument.
The West wastes more food than the entire third world can eat.
If you think that the world is overpopulated its probably because you live in a crowded urban center.
There is plenty of land in the rural areas that are inhabitable but aren't because they're owned by people like Ted Turner, probably a hero of yours because he believes the planet is overcrowded.
Yes, overcrowded while he owns entire states in the U.S.
Living in a large urban centre is not necessarily the same as overpopulation because large urban centres typically have a fairly equitable system of resource distribution. Overpopulation doesn't mean lots of people living in the same place. It means that there are too many people to be sustained by the resources available to them, and the result of overpopulation is necessarily war and atrocity.
Comment
-
Originally posted by squealpiggy View PostI don't think the world is overpopulated. I think that global overpopulation is simply not an issue while we have such an inequitable system of resource distribution. Instead the issue is local overpopulation, for example in places like Sudan or Rwanda and historically on Easter Island or in Meso-America.
Living in a large urban centre is not necessarily the same as overpopulation because large urban centres typically have a fairly equitable system of resource distribution. Overpopulation doesn't mean lots of people living in the same place. It means that there are too many people to be sustained by the resources available to them, and the result of overpopulation is necessarily war and atrocity.
The bold is a and precisely what we're talking about here isn't it?
You know this is pure falsehood yet you perpetuate it. Why is that?
Comment
-
Originally posted by INSECT View PostShe thought she was being clever by smirking about mass genocide.
Last edited by {Darko}; 10-18-2010, 06:15 PM.
Comment
-
Comment