Fists of Fluff aint fighting no one, he's gonna be banned in November. I framed his bum ass.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Tyson Fury Reveals Joshua Unification Would Be First, Then Wilder
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by BoxingFan85 View PostWith all due respect, British fans pay up even for mediocre fights that Sky hypes up.. So AJ vs Fury would be a sell out I recon..
Comment
-
Fury wants josh but josh calls the shots and if he wants to avoid fury, hate and wilder its up to him
But josh v parker could be before fury
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jewish Reptile View PostJoshua sells out versus guys like Whyte and Kingpin Johnson, why the fück they gonna put him with a doper or a puncher ?
Btw Scotty, why did you frame Tyson Too Fluff Furry for doping ?
Comment
-
Originally posted by hugh grant View PostFury wants josh but josh calls the shots and if he wants to avoid fury, hate and wilder its up to him
But josh v parker could be before fury
It has to be.. According to IBF, a deal has to be made by jan'17 & fight 90 days after that.. If AJ is fighting in Nov next, then its not Fury/Wilder..
Comment
-
-
-
I'll believe him when he's in the ring.
Even signing on the dotted line ain't a guarantee he'll turn up.
Comment
-
This cheating ass coward : I gave him a pass the first time Wilder called him out because he went on to fight Klitschko ( dirty ) but now he rather fight this euro bum Anthony Joshua instead....I hate this guy! I hope despite the fact he needs to cheat to win...that Deontay gets him in the ring and stretches him out cold!
Comment
-
I think fury has it backwards... In the grand scheme of things, fury would want to cashout in both fights..
Fight joshua first and lose, then no wilder fight.
But fight wilder first and lose, a joshua fight is still viable because it would still be huge in the UK..
Fighting wilder first, will pretty much guarantee fury both fights
Comment
Comment