Fact #1: Despite Paulie Maliggnagi's scorecard, Austin Trout was the rightful winner tonight.
Fact #2: Cotto may seem like a sore loser, but we don't really know what goes inside his head. He may think he won the fight and being in his "2nd" house makes it harder for him to accept his loss.
Fact #3: I'm no one to judge and though I agree that Austin DID won the fight, the 119 - 109 makes the other cards look suspicious. Every score I've seen hasn't been that wide and this being in the "hometown" of the challenger makes me paranoid. Please argue/argument on this one.
Fact #4: Austin was just a superior boxer and had a better game plan than Cotto. No reason for him to hang em up if he doesn't want to.
Fact #2: Cotto may seem like a sore loser, but we don't really know what goes inside his head. He may think he won the fight and being in his "2nd" house makes it harder for him to accept his loss.
Fact #3: I'm no one to judge and though I agree that Austin DID won the fight, the 119 - 109 makes the other cards look suspicious. Every score I've seen hasn't been that wide and this being in the "hometown" of the challenger makes me paranoid. Please argue/argument on this one.
Fact #4: Austin was just a superior boxer and had a better game plan than Cotto. No reason for him to hang em up if he doesn't want to.
Comment