Originally posted by hectari
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The Pac that fought Bradley and Marquez was lazy
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Michael Paine View PostMovement and punch output is obviously going to change if you have to be the hunter instead of the hunted. JMM 1 and 2 proves my point, they were close fights where he didn't look an unbeatable beast and his punch outputs were lower. He only looks great on the backfoot against slower fighters.
His movement and punch output has changed considerably after the Margarito fight.
Even if he didn't look unbeatable, he used to always come in hard. If you compare the JMM 1&2 fights to JMM 3, you can see how Pacquiao is slower and lazier. He didn't move like he used to.
It's not the styles, but the fighter. Pacquiao from the De La Hoya or Cotto fight would've given any fighter, boxer, or brawler, problems. Pacquiao from the Bradley fight wouldn't have beat Cotto (IMO).
Comment
-
Pac is now fighting as the legend, not the man in the making. That's the difference.
+ His bowlcut hair makes him too heavy.
Comment
-
The reality is that Pacquiao has become just another fat athlete. He got a taste of the good life and all his structure and commitment to his craft seem to have vanished.
Comment
-
Originally posted by SlySlickSmooth View PostPac is now fighting as the legend, not the man in the making. That's the difference.
+ His bowlcut hair makes him too heavy.
Comment
-
-
he looked lazy vs bradley but i completely disagree vs marquez, he looked hungry in that, atleast in the fight(i know in the lead up there was plenty of talk of him taking it easy)
Comment
-
-
Comment