Who do you consider to be the better fighter Juan Manuel Marquez or Manny Pacquiao?

[-jose-]

In The Record Books-Pacquiao is better

In The Ring-Marquez is better

[$tate of Mind]

Manny has a lot to prove against Bradley, he's done nothing since beating Cotto in '09 imo.

[bojangles1987]

Manny has a lot to prove against Bradley, he's done nothing since beating Cotto in '09 imo.

Surprised that fight got made. I really am, I thought Pac was just the carrot Arum dangled to bring Bradley to Top Rank. Didn't think he ever had any intention of letting Bradley fight Pac.

[Russian Crushin]

"skills" vs "technicality", theres a difference

[ИATAS]

I guess this means Ken Norton was a better fighter than Ali.

[LeG00N]

"skills" vs "technicality", theres a difference

Marquez is a more skillful fighter, and a better technical fighter

[LeG00N]

I guess this means Ken Norton was a better fighter than Ali.

Thats not what TS is saying,

[Neglect]

resume-Manny

skills -Jmm

THIS^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Pac has very limited skills IMO. He's mostly just very physically gifted.

[Toyman]

Umm lets see


Minus their 3 fights, pacquiao has an infinitely better resume


Head to head, pacquiao has won all 3



that leaves us with the obvious answer, which is pacquiao

[$coinblatt$]

I guess this means Ken Norton was a better fighter than Ali.

hes talking skillwise, and lmao @ you thinking Pacquiao is on the same level as Ali and Norton being on the same level as Marquez.