Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Did Mayweather Impose USADA So He Can Cheat But His Opponents Can't? *Facts only*

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #51
    Originally posted by Isaac Clarke View Post
    Fighters dehydrate to make weight, Saline IV's are used to rehydrate. What's the most logical reason the fighter used the IV after the weigh-in?

    Mayweather haters = PEDS


    why was it banned? answer this very simple question.


    u r just making excuses for a roider. how can u suck another man's dick this hard? I'm just curious. you have to be on his payroll at least right

    Comment


    • #52
      Originally posted by SplitSecond View Post
      From an old post.


      __________________________________________________ ____

      2015


      __________________________________________________

      “USADA is a drug-testing agency. USADA should not be granting waivers and exemptions.”
      — Bob Bennett NSAC director
      The language in the contract about positive tests being hushed up didn't come from the Mayweather camp.

      Mr. Hauser fails to specifically identify any provisions in the Testing Agreement that conflict with USADA’s statement that our professional boxing testing programs are in accordance with the WADA International Standards.

      In addition, Mr. Hauser’s statement that Floyd Mayweather received a TUE granted under standards different than the WADA International Standard for Therapeutic Use Exemptions (ISTUE) is false. The TUE Committee which granted a retroactive TUE to Mr. Mayweather relied upon the WADA ISTUE.
      Moreover, the Mayweather v Pacquiao testing program was the first time that the language contained in Paragraph 30 was ever included in a USADA professional boxing Testing Agreement. The language was added at the insistence of Mr. Pacquiao’s representatives.

      http://www.usada.org/wp-content/uplo...Tom-Hauser.pdf

      Comment


      • #53
        Originally posted by koolkc107 View Post
        The language in the contract about positive tests being hushed up didn't come from the Mayweather camp.

        Mr. Hauser fails to specifically identify any provisions in the Testing Agreement that conflict with USADA’s statement that our professional boxing testing programs are in accordance with the WADA International Standards.

        In addition, Mr. Hauser’s statement that Floyd Mayweather received a TUE granted under standards different than the WADA International Standard for Therapeutic Use Exemptions (ISTUE) is false. The TUE Committee which granted a retroactive TUE to Mr. Mayweather relied upon the WADA ISTUE.
        Moreover, the Mayweather v Pacquiao testing program was the first time that the language contained in Paragraph 30 was ever included in a USADA professional boxing Testing Agreement. The language was added at the insistence of Mr. Pacquiao’s representatives.

        http://www.usada.org/wp-content/uplo...Tom-Hauser.pdf


        Mayweather cheated.


        Was given a pass.


        end of discussion.

        Comment


        • #54
          Originally posted by HeadShots View Post
          lol @ this ****** again.


          are we talking WADA or USADA? I mean.... do you understand context?


          Mayweather broke the USADA protocol.
          USADA follow the WADA code.

          You aren't very informed are you?

          Comment


          • #55
            Originally posted by HeadShots View Post
            why was it banned? answer this very simple question.


            u r just making excuses for a roider. how can u suck another man's dick this hard? I'm just curious. you have to be on his payroll at least right
            The question should be why was it used. The panel that grants TUE's came to the conclusion it was for medical reasons. Which means Mayweather is cleared and ******s like you are left making conspiracy theories.

            Comment


            • #56
              Originally posted by HeadShots View Post
              lol @ this ****** again.


              are we talking WADA or USADA? I mean.... do you understand context?


              Mayweather broke the USADA protocol.
              Yeah, he "broke" the USADA protocol with the permission of USADA with a USADA DCO right in the room when he was recieving the IVs, a DCO who took samples before AND after the IVs.


              Again, none of these accusers can explain how all his tests (before and after alleged IV masking) came back clean.

              None of these accusers can explain how all his testing is in correspondence with the Athlete Biological Profile Floyd has has since 2010.

              None of these accusers can explain how USADA would take down a popular athlete like Lance Armstrong (who, by the way with access to plenty of money to pay folks off, was unable to bribe USADA) but would protect one of the most infamous and hated athletes in the last half century.

              He is clean folks. It's the only conclusion any logical person can make, like it or not.

              Comment


              • #57
                Originally posted by HeadShots View Post
                Mayweather cheated.


                Was given a pass.


                end of discussion.
                With all the documentation that exists otherwise, you still think he cheated?

                SMH

                And, I just showed you where the language about hiding test results came from Pac's camp.

                No comment on that?

                Here's more from the same source:


                This is wrong. USADA agreed to the request from Mr. Pacquiao’s
                representatives that USADA provide mutual notification to both
                fighters upon the approval of a TUE; however, no limitation was
                imposed concerning the processing or approval process for retroactive
                TUE applications.

                Furthermore, neither Mr. Mayweather nor his representatives were
                involved in the negotiations between USADA and Mr. Pacquiao’s
                representatives regarding the revisions to the Testing Agreement.
                Once USADA and Mr. Pacquiao’s representatives settled on the
                revised contract language, it was sent to Mr. Mayweather’s
                representatives for their review and comment. No changes were
                requested by Mr. Mayweather’s representatives and the Testing
                Agreement was finalized and fully executed without further revision.
                Last edited by koolkc107; 01-09-2017, 11:28 AM.

                Comment


                • #58
                  Originally posted by koolkc107 View Post
                  Not sure Hauser retracted anything concerning the IV.

                  I know he had to back off an earlier article he did many years ago about alleged positive tests (an unsubstantiated rumor that persist to this day) because GBP was going to sue him onto a free cheese line.
                  Clicky

                  ...There’s one significant correction in it that I accept. Prior to USADA’s September 17 statement, it was widely believed that its doping control officer went to Mayweather’s Las Vegas home to conduct an unannounced drug test and found evidence of an IV being administered to Mayweather. USADA maintains – and I will accept - that “Mr. Mayweather declared the infusion in advance to the USADA DCO.”...

                  Comment


                  • #59
                    Originally posted by b00g13man View Post
                    Must have been hard for Hauser to write that, lol!

                    It is basically admitting Floyd made zero attempt to hide anything.

                    Comment


                    • #60
                      Originally posted by koolkc107 View Post
                      Must have been hard for Hauser to write that, lol!

                      It is basically admitting Floyd made zero attempt to hide anything.
                      It's a pretty significant deviation from the original story, and it was buried in a rather verbose article. Pretty sure nobody is aware of it.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP