It's only people who look at Boxrec and because they see a L or W over one guy or another they make assumptions based off the record.
For example, seeing Danny Green with KO 1 over Roy Jones would make one of these people assume Danny Green is better than Roy Jones and better than guys that lost to Jones or couldn't KO him like Hopkins, Calzaghe, Griffin etc.
To tell you the truth, at cruiser and now, he is better than roy.
I don't get it, some of y'all clown other members and accuse them of finding infos on Boxrec.
What's wrong with looking up stuff on Boxrec ? That's the reason the site was created. Even Lawyers and Doctors don't have all the information in front of them when asked a legal or medical question.
Some of us might have better memory than others, that's good, but looking up stuff on Boxrec is not some sign of weakness.
Boxrec is a good tool for all boxing fans, new and old alike. Some of the info on it might not always be accurate, but, how many other boxing sites can provide that kind of info like Boxrec can.
I figure it is because some people do not like to have their biased arguments/claims disproven by facts.
Tweet
Comment