Who has the better resume Pernell Whitaker or Manny Pacquiao?

[IronDanHamza]

one draw is not an entire resume. how are you gonna sit there & pretend it is?

dont you have to take into account other things?

Never have I once claimed that.

I'm merely responding to you and stating that Whitaker's win over Chavez is better than anything Pacquaio has done in his career.

Does this automatically make his resume better? No.

But it's one of the reasons.

[Roy Hobbs]

No it isn't!

What you've been trying to say is;

"Pacquaio has won more titles in more divisions"

"Pacquaio has beat more HOF'ers"

"Pacquaio has more FOTY awards"

And stupid logic like that.

boxing awards & decorations are stupid logic?

isnt that what a boxing resume is?

what thread are we in?

[Roy Hobbs]

Never have I once claimed that.

I'm merely responding to you and stating that Whitaker's win over Chavez is better than anything Pacquaio has done in his career.

Does this automatically make his resume better? No.

But it's one of the reasons.

that's your opinion.

being the only fighter in the history of the sport to hold a flyweight title, a lightweight title, & a welterweight title is better than getting a draw with chavez sr.

that's just my opinion.

[IronDanHamza]

morales 2x, marquez 2x, barerra 2x, oscar, cotto, clottey, hatton, mosley, margarito, bradley is better than

chavez, nelson, mcgirt 2x, ramirez, haugen, paez, nazario, pineda.

it just is.

If you include fighters like Oscar and Margarito on name value then yeah, "It just is".

If you include each of their actual top, legit wins;

Pacquaio - Sasakul, Lebadwa, Barrera 1, Morales 2, Marquez 2, Hatton, Cotto.

Whitaker - Chavez, Nelson, Ramirez x2, McGirt x2, Haugen, Vazquez.

Then I'd say it's Whitaker.

[IronDanHamza]

boxing awards & decorations are stupid logic?

Yes, it is.

isnt that what a boxing resume is?

No, it isn't.

[IronDanHamza]

that's your opinion.

being the only fighter in the history of the sport to hold a flyweight title, a lightweight title, & a welterweight title is better than getting a draw with chavez sr.

that's just my opinion.

You keep saying "Getting a draw with Chavez" whilst acknowledging it was a robbery.

Why is this?

[Light_Speed]

that's your opinion.

being the only fighter in the history of the sport to hold a flyweight title, a lightweight title, & a welterweight title is better than getting a draw with chavez sr.

that's just my opinion.

Don't forget featherweight, there was no alphabet title on the line because Barrera was stripped but Pac won The Ring title. He's the only man to become champion in 4 of the original weightclasses.

[Roy Hobbs]

If you include fighters like Oscar and Margarito on name value then yeah, "It just is".

If you include each of their actual top, legit wins;

Pacquaio - Sasakul, Lebadwa, Barrera 1, Morales 2, Marquez 2, Hatton, Cotto.

Whitaker - Chavez, Nelson, Ramirez x2, McGirt x2, Haugen, Vazquez.

Then I'd say it's Whitaker.

im done talking to somebody who thinks boxing awards, decorations, number of hall of famers faced, hall of fame wins, division titles are considered stupid logic in a thread titled who has a better resume. we didnt even go over longevity, # of top 10 p4p fighters faced all of which favor pacquiao but go ahead try to slant & warp the argument any way you can, at the end of the day pacquiao has the greater resume.

[IronDanHamza]

Again, who on Ray Robinson's resume is a skilled as De La Hoya and Chavez? Does that mean Whitaker has a better resume than Robinson? Look at the WHOLE resume.

Gavilan is more skilled than both of them.

But I agree that's not the be all and end all.

Great fighter but not as accomplished as Chavez was when Whitaker beat him.

Perhaps not when they respectively won their fights.

But Gavilan is certainly a greater fighter than Chavez, which answers your question.

[Roy Hobbs]

Yes, it is.





No, it isn't.

i thought you were actually a decent poster, i didnt think you were a troll.