Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why do pac's opponent get credit for blockin/evading his punches??!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    to be fair all fighters get credit for the defense and Manny miss are wild they make the other opponent look good.

    ****ing Bradley was looking like Pernell Whitaker at times slipping Manny punches

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Primera View Post
      You being serious?

      Manny landed all but 1 effective punch on a one legged Bradley.

      You all cry about how Bradley didn't land much but it was the same for Pac.
      Pac landed more than Bradley everyone can agree on that. And who was the champ as well? Bradley got the decision and didnt deserve it, JMM must be outraged at the judges, even if he does understand how Pac must be feeling.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by hugh grant View Post
        Pac landed more than Bradley everyone can agree on that. And who was the champ as well? Bradley got the decision and didnt deserve it, JMM must be outraged at the judges, even if he does understand how Pac must be feeling.
        what does him being the champ mean???hr took JMM belt at 130 in a controversial fight.JMM was the champ

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by hugh grant View Post
          Pac landed more than Bradley everyone can agree on that. And who was the champ as well? Bradley got the decision and didnt deserve it, JMM must be outraged at the judges, even if he does understand how Pac must be feeling.
          what does him being the champ mean???he took JMM belt at 130 in a controversial fight.JMM was the champ

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Phenom View Post
            to be fair all fighters get credit for the defense and Manny miss are wild they make the other opponent look good.

            ****ing Bradley was looking like Pernell Whitaker at times slipping Manny punches
            yes he did,lol

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by hugh grant View Post
              Pac landed more than Bradley everyone can agree on that. And who was the champ as well? Bradley got the decision and didnt deserve it, JMM must be outraged at the judges.
              another reason Manny Pacquiao lost was because he was looking so bad at times missing wildly hitting nothing but air and off balance while Bradley just taunts him.

              Close fight neither guy dominated any rounds and Bradley was looking less stupid when he miss

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by larryx2012 View Post
                what does him being the champ mean???he took JMM belt at 130 in a controversial fight.JMM was the champ
                Historically challengers are suppposed to be seen to be trying to do something, go beyond the call of duty so to speak or do you suddenly not know that? How can you compare the tiger and absolute beast of an animal that nearly took JMMs head off his shoulders, and people being scared for JMM recieving one more punch or it could be over to Bradley and Pac?

                Originally posted by Phenom View Post
                another reason Manny Pacquiao lost was because he was looking so bad at times missing wildly hitting nothing but air and off balance while Bradley just taunts him.

                Close fight neither guy dominated any rounds and Bradley was looking less stupid when he miss
                YOur just making things up as you go along now.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by -Kev- View Post
                  Hatton actually made Pacquiao miss a whole 8 punch combination in their short fight. This is Hatton.

                  So people shouldn't be surprised when some one dodges Pacquiao's punches. He punches very off balanced and lunges a lot. That's why he doesn't look so good against Marquez.
                  mosley even though he lost he showed someone with good foot movement/speed COUlD possibly neutralize pacs offense

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by hugh grant View Post
                    Historically challengers are suppposed to be seen to be trying to do something, go beyond the call of duty so to speak or do you suddenly not know that? How can you compare the tiger and absolute beast of an animal that nearly took JMMs head off his shoulders, and people being scared for JMM recieving one more punch or it could be over to Bradley and Pac?



                    Your just making things up as you go along now.
                    son what fight were you watch??most had JMM winning the 2nd fight

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by GrandpaBernard View Post
                      what these guys said. it's like some of these ******s still think scoring is all about clean effective punching even after years of watching boxing
                      For real. People using amateur boxing rules to score fights.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP