For those who said "Manny Pacquiao was winning and got caught with a lucky punch"

[SplitSecond]

i kinda knew thats where u were gonna go with that cuz ur whole argument is not to count punches lol

FACT is, he did land more, a lot more and if you didn't see a clear winner, than its clear you don't know a damn thing about viewing/judging a fight and making a correct decision.

I think he's one of those people that gave bradley the first rd vs pacquiao because "he moved better" despite landing nothing

[figzuki]

Who the **** counts punches? You sit there and count? FACT IS boxing isn't judged by just landing punches. If I landed 3 pitty pat punches and you land two hard counters, who wins then? Pitty pat? LOL @ you telling someone about not knowing how to judge a fight when you use CompuBox as your basis

so how did calzaghe win fights then lol, he's all pitty pat!!!!

he wasn't hard countering at all, work rate and um punches landed

[figzuki]

I think he's one of those people that gave bradley the first rd vs pacquiao because "he moved better" despite landing nothing

gotta be a floyd fan.

[S. Saddler 1310]

boxing bouts are interpreted. clean, effective punching - defense - generalship of the ring. those are the criteria you are supposed to take into consideration to interpret rounds. hate to state the obvious, but scoring a fight is not just a matter of counting punches.

[S. Saddler 1310]

I think he's one of those people that gave bradley the first rd vs pacquiao because "he moved better" despite landing nothing

while Pacquiao just couldn't miss Tim. i see Harold Lederman has a boxingscene account. cute.

[IMDAZED]

so how did calzaghe win fights then lol, he's all pitty pat!!!!

he wasn't hard countering at all, work rate and um punches landed

All pitty pat? All? Ok.

[IMDAZED]

so if you don't score fights on the basis of punches landed, how do you do it then?

blood? crowd ooo's and ahhh's? cornerwork? what do you base it on?

Clean punching, defense, ring generalship, effective aggression. You wait for CompuBox

[IMDAZED]

boxing bouts are interpreted. clean, effective punching - defense - generalship of the ring. those are the criteria you are supposed to take into consideration to interpret rounds. hate to state the obvious, but scoring a fight is not just a matter of counting punches.

No, you go by HBO announcers, HBO stats and who you're rooting for.

[S. Saddler 1310]

No, you go by HBO announcers, HBO stats and who you're rooting for.

many do, unfortunately.

[SplitSecond]

while Pacquiao just couldn't miss Tim. i see Harold Lederman has a boxingscene account. cute.

you gave bradley the first rd too? man, ******s in droves